Yet many of these small institutions are under attack. Almost a decade ago, the federal government imposed rules aimed at reining in Wall Street’s excesses. In the years since, a growing number of credit unions and community banks have been ensnared by this costly web of federal regulation.

Fortunately, Congress is standing up for small lenders. The Senate recently green-lit legislation that would exempt credit unions and smaller community financial institutions from the most burdensome of these federal regulations. The House followed suit — and the bill was signed into law by President Donald Trump.

Much of this regulatory strife is a product of the Great Recession. In order to monitor the big banks responsible for the financial crisis more closely, Congress enacted the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (better known as the Dodd-Frank Act) in 2010. The law has largely prevented these titans from engaging in the sort of predatory behavior that almost took down the American economy.

But it has proved costly for community financial institutions, which had little to do with the Great Recession. Indeed, in mid-2009, at the peak of the crisis, just 2 percent of credit union loans were delinquent. That’s less than one-fourth as many bad loans as the big banks had on their books. Regulations are eating up 1 of every 6 dollars credit unions spend on operations each year — or $6.1 billion in total. Some smaller financial institutions have been unable to shoulder these additional costs. Since 2009, about 2,000 credit unions and 1,500 community banks have closed.

That’s music to the big banks’ ears. Credit unions are organized as not-for-profit institutions. They reinvest their earnings in their members, through lower fees and better rates. The competition provided by credit unions and community banks helps keep bigger financial institutions honest. Fewer choices for consumers, of course, results in higher prices.

The Senate led the charge to ward off those higher prices. This spring, the upper chamber passed the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act, Senate Bill 2155 — a bill that would offer credit unions and smaller community banks relief from the most burdensome of Dodd-Frank’s regulations.

In so doing, it would free up credit unions to divert spending away from regulatory compliance — and toward their members. The bill would streamline the process for securing a mortgage. It would also tweak how some loans to landlords are categorized. That move alone would unlock an extra $4 billion for credit unions to lend to small businesses and over $34 million in Alaska.

Crucially, the bill doesn’t touch restrictions on huge Wall Street banks — the ones that actually pose a systemic risk to the economy — or interfere with regulatory agencies like the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

The passage of SB 2155 would not have been possible without the earlier work of the House on House Resolution 10, the Financial CHOICE Act, which was introduced by House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling. Several of House Resolution 10’s provisions are included in SB 2155.

Years of deliberation, hearings, markups and floor votes in the House inspired and prompted the Senate to craft and ultimately pass SB 2155. As a result, it’s effectively a bicameral bill; the House deserves credit for laying the groundwork for SB 2155.

With the House formally green-lighting SB 2155 — we are on the path to easing the regulatory burden on the lenders that power so much of America’s economy. We would like to thank Alaska’s congressional delegation for their leadership and support of SB 2155. This will provide meaningful regulatory relief for Alaska’s credit unions and community banks.

Dan McCue is president of the Alaska Credit Union League.