Alaska gubernatorial candidates tout pipeline, policy to Fairbanks voters
by Jeff Richardson / jrichardson@newsminer.com
Jul 07, 2010 | 3659 views | 32 32 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Gubernatorial candidate Bill Walker answers a question during a lunch forum sponsored by the Greater Fairbanks Chamber of Commerce on Tuesday, July 6, 2010, at the Carlson Center. From left are, state Sen. Hollis French, Gerald Heikes, Merica Hlatcu, Sam Little, Gov. Sean Parnell, Ralph Samuels and Walker. Sam Harrel/News-Miner
view image
FAIRBANKS — A local audience put the heat under Alaska’s governor candidates during a rapid-fire lunch forum at the Carlson Center on Tuesday, grilling them on resource development, the economy and even their preferred candidate for U.S. Senate.

The forum, sponsored by the Greater Fairbanks Chamber of Commerce, attracted Republicans Gerald Heikes, Merica Hlatcu, Sam Little, Gov. Sean Parnell, Ralph Samuels and Bill Walker, along with Democratic state Sen. Hollis French.

Democrat Ethan Berkowitz and Republican Brad Snowden did not attend.

Candidates gave bite-sized responses to numerous issues during the lightning-fast format, which allowed 60 seconds or less to answer each in a diverse set of questions. The primary election is Aug. 24.

One of the lighter moments came, amid audience chuckling, when Parnell visibly squirmed after being asked whether he supported Fairbanks attorney Joe Miller or Sen. Lisa Murkowski in the Republican primary for U.S. Senate.

Parnell eventually said he would give his support to whomever wins the primary, which was the same response that Walker and Little later gave. Samuels and Hlatcu said they support Murkowski, while Heikes endorsed Miller. French said he backs Democratic candidate Scott McAdams, the mayor of Sitka.

Many of the questions veered back toward how candidates would deal with Fairbanks’ high energy costs and particularly their approach to bringing natural gas to the Interior. The issue sparked some of the feistiest exchanges between candidates, most notably between Parnell, Walker and Samuels.

Walker, an attorney and former Valdez mayor, has made an “all-Alaska” pipeline route from the North Slope to Valdez the centerpiece of his campaign. During the 90-minute forum, he frequently brought up the importance of the project and chastised Parnell for moving too slowly.

“It’s our time to do this,” he said. “We’ve waited and waited and waited and studied this to death.”

Parnell said he isn’t bound to any particular pipeline route and that he’ll look at whichever route is the most viable. He defended his approach, which included a veto to a change to the oil and gas structure this year, as a way to create a consistent atmosphere for developers.

Samuels, a former state representative from Anchorage, said a smaller gas line to Fairbanks should be the top priority and would do more to help local consumers. The airline and travel industry executive touted his pro-business perspective during the forum, saying he was the only candidate willing to take a long-term look at the state’s economy.

“We have a lot of opportunities and we have a lot of challenges,” he said.

French said Alaskans should insist on a high-capacity gas line, since it’s hard to make small quantities of gas economically viable. The project itself should be led by private industry, he said, not the state.

He touted the project as part of his theme of strengthening the state’s infrastructure, specifically mentioning improvements to the Dalton Highway to better reach the state’s resources.

“The best thing the government can do is build a strong infrastructure — roads, ports — to build a strong economy,” French said.

Heikes, a Palmer contractor who described himself as a “Constitutional Christian conservative,” focused on having a state-run cooperative to stabilize oil and gas prices. Hlatcu, an Anchorage engineer, touted transportation projects, including an improved railroad network.

Little, a truck driver who appeared at the forum wearing a cowboy hat and red Western shirt, at one point pulled out a deck of cards, saying his four “aces” would be reinstating the longevity bonus, building a refinery in the state, helping Delta farmers, and giving road and ferry access to Yukon River villages.

Little said he’d provide a common-sense approach to Alaska’s fiscal problems.

“If I spend more than I make, I’ll be broke,” Little said. “That’s the same with the state of Alaska.”

The candidates differed on their views of the proposed Pebble Mine development, although none gave their outright endorsement of the project. Little and French both said they oppose the project, while Hlatcu and Heikes said they are wary of the environmental dangers to the nearby Bristol Bay fisheries.

Walker, Samuels and Parnell all said the permitting process for the mine should be completed before politicians weigh in on whether it should move ahead.

“Let’s let the science and the public speak,” Parnell said.

Only Heikes said he would support Ballot Measure 1 on the fall ballot, which would prohibit the use of public funds for lobbying and campaigning and would ban people with government contracts or their family members from making political contributions.

Most of the candidates said they would include a request for the University of Alaska Fairbanks Life Sciences building in next year’s capital budget if this fall’s bond issue package fails.

Heikes disagreed, saying he’d consider the issue rejected by voters, while Samuels said proponents would need to convince him the project needed to be revived.

Contact staff writer Jeff Richardson at 459-7518.
Comments
(32)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
myAlaska
|
July 07, 2010
Don't you belive a thing they say until we get our way it's all politics until they are elected then when they break their promises they blame the other side or each other. Let's light a fire under their cold behinds and get som gas here in 5 years, IT CAN BE DONE BELIVE IT.
99712
|
July 07, 2010
Oldowl- Wildlife protection issued about 5,800 citations last year. They operate with 93% state money- and 7% federal funding. How are they going to do their job when the state no longer has adequate revenue? French has consumed the AGIA KoolAid, and the Canadian gasline project will NOT provide any revenue for at least 20 years. French is against Pebble mine, yet none of the permits have even been applied for. Does he always make up his mind before he has the facts? Yesterday he said one drop of CN would destroy Bristol Bay. He doesn't have a clue. Any chemist or even a well educated High School kid could explain why that is absurd. French wants to diversify the economy? How? You need revenue to pay for schools and the basic infrastructure. Walker has explained in detail how he would diversify the economy with the gasline- which provides new revenue, jobs, and with low cost energy all sorts of new industry. You really should visit www.billwalkerforgovernor.com and learn more. And 'Lifeisshort'- you did not know that Gov. Hickel donated ALL of his interest in YPC to charity years ago? You also did not know that Walker put together a gasline project (with the critical multi- billion dollar equity investment) only to be rejected by Murkowski and his felon "lead gasline negotiator" Jim Clark? A normal person would be mad at those who fought the voter's mandate to build the All Alaska Gasline.
oldowl
|
July 07, 2010
99712 - I was grouping wildlife protection with wildlife CONSERVATION. Yes the wildlife troopers are for wildlife protection but they are way underfunded and short staffed and do not do as much as they need to be doing for this reason. I think the gas line is not the only issue and I intend to vote for someone who is not a one issue candidate and that is Hollis French. He is also against the Pebble mine, for health care and education reform, diversifying the economy,etc. and yes he can get the pipeline built too.
1AhHa
|
July 07, 2010
Any of them mention the profit the state is making by selling our royalty oil at at about 8 times the cost of getting it to the local refineries? And how much it is driving up the cost of living in Alaska? At least doubling your electric bill and more than doubling your fuel oil bill. Socialism fun till you run out of someone else's money to steal. vrjnx
Susitna-Flower
|
July 07, 2010
Bill Walker may be from "south central" now, but the majority of his life has NOT been spent in Anchorage, which is what MOST people would refer to as south central. He was born in Fairbanks, lived in Delta and Valdez. His policy reflects this WHOLE ALASKA experience, and I agree when people finally do realize that the leading candidates in the Republican race for Governor each have a strong commitment on our Natural Gas, Samuels = Bullet line, Parnell = Trans Canada, Bill Walker = All Alaskan Gas Line. THEN the choice is clear. Walker is the man for Alaska!
Invictus
|
July 07, 2010
Worn out sections of the pipeline are easily replaced.
aurorawatcher
|
July 07, 2010
99712

I hadn't seen those polls, but it doesn't surprise me. Alaskan voters are, for the most part, far more up on the issues than, say, my relatives in Washington state. Unfortunately, though, there are still a lot of people who answer polls based on name recognition.

It's good news about Walker. He's from South-Central (Valdez), but he has a fair-minded approach to the whole state. He's not afraid to step out and say, "We're going to make this happen, come hell or high water, and we're not going to care if our in-state line affects what the petro companies do." We've been sitting in neutral for 30 years because we kept waiting for the oil companies. It's time to stop that and just do what needs to be done!
Doug_in_Salcha
|
July 07, 2010
"Most people don't understand that the TAPS pipeline is wearing out..."

Most B-52s in the Air Force Inventory were built before (most) of the pilots flying them. Agree with aurorawatcher in that the pipeline can last indefinitely if it is maintained and taken care of...
Doug_in_Salcha
|
July 07, 2010
aurorawatcher,

Didn't know you were a woman but let me tell you that I've known a lot of women who had a "bigger pair" that many men I've known. Yes, they were "symbolic" but they had no end of something my grandmother used to call "Gumption".

They spoke what was on their mind clearly and with EMPHASIS. Now I'm going to have to pay attention more often to what you've been saying to determine whether I agree with you.
aurorawatcher
|
July 07, 2010
JaniceFbx

Lt. Governor candidates in Alaska run on a seperate ticket from Gubernatorial candidates, so Sean Parnell, while a Republican, has considerable differences from Sarah Palin. Sarah is a true fiscal conservative who refused to grow government during her time in office. Sean Parnell has not been that strong of a fiscal conservative. He also blinked when the oil companies roared, which she didn't. So, I wouldn't necessarily expect an endorsement from her.
99712
|
July 07, 2010


Aurora Watcher- what you say is true, but did you know the research shows that when voters know the gasline project each candidate supports that Bill Walker wins the race?

aurorawatcher
|
July 07, 2010
sldon

What would you suggest we do that we're not already doing?

I mean, I'm educating my children to think critically about world events and historical revisionism. I am (as always) educating myself on the issues and the candidates. I am attempting to share that knowledge with others. I am writing my representatives (even the non-representative Begich) letting them know what I want. Being a woman, I'm not going to grow a pair, but I think I have a fair amount of courage.

So what is it that you think we should be doing that we're not doing?
Invictus
|
July 07, 2010
"If we didn't have the National Parks here there would be little wildlife left."

Please defend your statement.

Is it true that there is little wildlife outside of the National Parks system? Would appreciate recent and historic data to compare and contrast.
aurorawatcher
|
July 07, 2010
YellowFang

The TAPS is NOT wearing out! My husband works on it. It gets regular maintenance. It'll last another 30 years if they maintain it -- maybe longer. There are pipelines in the Lower 48 that have been in use for a half-century and can go another century. When you hear about a shut-down for maintenance reasons, that's a sign that they're repairing the system; not a sign that the system needs to be replaced. It's kind of like changing the oil in your car. You don't total the car for that; it's meant to help it last longer.

What's going on, why the byflow is so low, is that the oil companies are not exploring and drilling. Some of that is because of a difficult federal permitting process. Some of that is because of the drilling moritorium. Some of that is because they're sitting on oil leases. Sarah Palin proved that last year when she demanded they start drilling at Pt McKenzie or give back the leases. Lo and behold, they started drilling. Why are they sitting on the leases rather than maximizing the resource? Well, if people like you are under the opinion that TAPS needs to be replaced, then you don't ask why the production is so low. You blame the low production on TAPS rather than on the oil companies.

So why are they holding back on drilling and exploration? Now that's a good question. I haven't heard a good answer, but a theory might be that a scarce resource is worth more than a plentiful resource and that our political environment for decades has built up our expectations of running out of oil and a lot of policies are based on that, with more headed our way.

That's a theory.

Oil production can and does need to be increased, but we really NEED natural gas IN STATE. The oil situation needs attention, but we really need a governor who will move ahead with gas delivery even if the State has to build the line for itself. Recognize that Samuels doesn't think Fairbanks needs to be a part of that. Walker has stated his commitment to Fairbanks getting the gas first. So naturally, I'm voting for the guy who has a plan (Walker) and who thinks Fairbanks shouldn't be left out (Walker).
aurorawatcher
|
July 07, 2010
oldowl

Parnell has name recognition. That's also what favors Lisa in the Senate race. Most of these polls aren't conducted very well. They ask if you would vote for Parnell, Walker or .... They poll anyone, rather than registered likely voters. That skews the poll because my 17-year-old daughter -- more politically knowledgeable than most teens -- would answer with the name she knows, and she can't even vote.

Primaries in Alaska, though, actually do see some turnover in recent elections. Alaskans pay attention more than they do in most states. I would note that we just entered the campaign season. The biggest number of decisions will be made at the Tanana Valley Fair candidate forum. Sarah Palin was virtually unknown before that forum when she ran against Murkowski; the next day, everybody was talking about her. That's more than a month away.

So we'll see.
JaniceFbx
|
July 07, 2010
"One of the lighter moments came, amid audience chuckling, when Parnell visibly squirmed after being asked whether he supported...Miller or Murkowski."

Uh oh, Sean's boss Sarah isn't going to like that. Has she endorsed him for the primary yet? I hear crickets.

YellowFang
|
July 07, 2010
We are in a world of hurt. Most people don't understand that the TAPS pipeline is wearing out and that with the amount of oil declining we are in danger of it just shutting down. When that happens, 85% of our state economy goes with it, and we have nothing in place to replace the income from the oil. No gas pipeline. Nothing at all. What do we think we are going to do?

Parnell is off chasing pie-in-the-sky. The Canadian government hasn't been able to get its own MacKenzie Delta Pipeline through the First Nations---yet he thinks his competing AGIA pipeline will succeed?

Samuels is talking about increasing oil production---but he's not talking about the need for a new oil pipeline to get that oil to market. He's not telling people that it will take ten years to see any profit.

None of them but Walker are pointing out the obvious fact --- we need to get that gas pipeline built and in place BEFORE the oil is gone and we don't have ten years to wait.

99712
|
July 07, 2010


Oldowl- Public Safety does wildlife protection- and they issue thousands of citations per year for hunting and fishing violations. Most of their funding is from state dollars- even though you are correct that they do get some federal money.

I don't even disagree with your thesis. But if we risk destroying our economy by failing to bring in new revenue, its going to be the children and the wildlife that will really suffer. Hungry people don't give a rip about hunting laws.

We need new revenue- and Walker is the ONLY one talking about this. 90% of our revenue is from an oil pipeline that is now two thirds empty. If the price of oil had not shot up after we invaded Iraq we wuld already be in big trouble.

Time is not on our side.

oldowl
|
July 07, 2010
I see very little wildlife protection being done by F&G only wildlife killing and mismanagement. A high percentage of their funds, particularly for predator control, comes from federal funding like the Pittman-Robinson funds. If we didn't have the National Parks here there would be little wildlife left.
Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.