The forum, sponsored by the Greater Fairbanks Chamber of Commerce, attracted Republicans Gerald Heikes, Merica Hlatcu, Sam Little, Gov. Sean Parnell, Ralph Samuels and Bill Walker, along with Democratic state Sen. Hollis French.
Democrat Ethan Berkowitz and Republican Brad Snowden did not attend.
Candidates gave bite-sized responses to numerous issues during the lightning-fast format, which allowed 60 seconds or less to answer each in a diverse set of questions. The primary election is Aug. 24.
One of the lighter moments came, amid audience chuckling, when Parnell visibly squirmed after being asked whether he supported Fairbanks attorney Joe Miller or Sen. Lisa Murkowski in the Republican primary for U.S. Senate.
Parnell eventually said he would give his support to whomever wins the primary, which was the same response that Walker and Little later gave. Samuels and Hlatcu said they support Murkowski, while Heikes endorsed Miller. French said he backs Democratic candidate Scott McAdams, the mayor of Sitka.
Many of the questions veered back toward how candidates would deal with Fairbanks’ high energy costs and particularly their approach to bringing natural gas to the Interior. The issue sparked some of the feistiest exchanges between candidates, most notably between Parnell, Walker and Samuels.
Walker, an attorney and former Valdez mayor, has made an “all-Alaska” pipeline route from the North Slope to Valdez the centerpiece of his campaign. During the 90-minute forum, he frequently brought up the importance of the project and chastised Parnell for moving too slowly.
“It’s our time to do this,” he said. “We’ve waited and waited and waited and studied this to death.”
Parnell said he isn’t bound to any particular pipeline route and that he’ll look at whichever route is the most viable. He defended his approach, which included a veto to a change to the oil and gas structure this year, as a way to create a consistent atmosphere for developers.
Samuels, a former state representative from Anchorage, said a smaller gas line to Fairbanks should be the top priority and would do more to help local consumers. The airline and travel industry executive touted his pro-business perspective during the forum, saying he was the only candidate willing to take a long-term look at the state’s economy.
“We have a lot of opportunities and we have a lot of challenges,” he said.
French said Alaskans should insist on a high-capacity gas line, since it’s hard to make small quantities of gas economically viable. The project itself should be led by private industry, he said, not the state.
He touted the project as part of his theme of strengthening the state’s infrastructure, specifically mentioning improvements to the Dalton Highway to better reach the state’s resources.
“The best thing the government can do is build a strong infrastructure — roads, ports — to build a strong economy,” French said.
Heikes, a Palmer contractor who described himself as a “Constitutional Christian conservative,” focused on having a state-run cooperative to stabilize oil and gas prices. Hlatcu, an Anchorage engineer, touted transportation projects, including an improved railroad network.
Little, a truck driver who appeared at the forum wearing a cowboy hat and red Western shirt, at one point pulled out a deck of cards, saying his four “aces” would be reinstating the longevity bonus, building a refinery in the state, helping Delta farmers, and giving road and ferry access to Yukon River villages.
Little said he’d provide a common-sense approach to Alaska’s fiscal problems.
“If I spend more than I make, I’ll be broke,” Little said. “That’s the same with the state of Alaska.”
The candidates differed on their views of the proposed Pebble Mine development, although none gave their outright endorsement of the project. Little and French both said they oppose the project, while Hlatcu and Heikes said they are wary of the environmental dangers to the nearby Bristol Bay fisheries.
Walker, Samuels and Parnell all said the permitting process for the mine should be completed before politicians weigh in on whether it should move ahead.
“Let’s let the science and the public speak,” Parnell said.
Only Heikes said he would support Ballot Measure 1 on the fall ballot, which would prohibit the use of public funds for lobbying and campaigning and would ban people with government contracts or their family members from making political contributions.
Most of the candidates said they would include a request for the University of Alaska Fairbanks Life Sciences building in next year’s capital budget if this fall’s bond issue package fails.
Heikes disagreed, saying he’d consider the issue rejected by voters, while Samuels said proponents would need to convince him the project needed to be revived.
Contact staff writer Jeff Richardson at 459-7518.


I hadn't seen those polls, but it doesn't surprise me. Alaskan voters are, for the most part, far more up on the issues than, say, my relatives in Washington state. Unfortunately, though, there are still a lot of people who answer polls based on name recognition.
It's good news about Walker. He's from South-Central (Valdez), but he has a fair-minded approach to the whole state. He's not afraid to step out and say, "We're going to make this happen, come hell or high water, and we're not going to care if our in-state line affects what the petro companies do." We've been sitting in neutral for 30 years because we kept waiting for the oil companies. It's time to stop that and just do what needs to be done!
Most B-52s in the Air Force Inventory were built before (most) of the pilots flying them. Agree with aurorawatcher in that the pipeline can last indefinitely if it is maintained and taken care of...
Didn't know you were a woman but let me tell you that I've known a lot of women who had a "bigger pair" that many men I've known. Yes, they were "symbolic" but they had no end of something my grandmother used to call "Gumption".
They spoke what was on their mind clearly and with EMPHASIS. Now I'm going to have to pay attention more often to what you've been saying to determine whether I agree with you.
Lt. Governor candidates in Alaska run on a seperate ticket from Gubernatorial candidates, so Sean Parnell, while a Republican, has considerable differences from Sarah Palin. Sarah is a true fiscal conservative who refused to grow government during her time in office. Sean Parnell has not been that strong of a fiscal conservative. He also blinked when the oil companies roared, which she didn't. So, I wouldn't necessarily expect an endorsement from her.
Aurora Watcher- what you say is true, but did you know the research shows that when voters know the gasline project each candidate supports that Bill Walker wins the race?
What would you suggest we do that we're not already doing?
I mean, I'm educating my children to think critically about world events and historical revisionism. I am (as always) educating myself on the issues and the candidates. I am attempting to share that knowledge with others. I am writing my representatives (even the non-representative Begich) letting them know what I want. Being a woman, I'm not going to grow a pair, but I think I have a fair amount of courage.
So what is it that you think we should be doing that we're not doing?
Please defend your statement.
Is it true that there is little wildlife outside of the National Parks system? Would appreciate recent and historic data to compare and contrast.
The TAPS is NOT wearing out! My husband works on it. It gets regular maintenance. It'll last another 30 years if they maintain it -- maybe longer. There are pipelines in the Lower 48 that have been in use for a half-century and can go another century. When you hear about a shut-down for maintenance reasons, that's a sign that they're repairing the system; not a sign that the system needs to be replaced. It's kind of like changing the oil in your car. You don't total the car for that; it's meant to help it last longer.
What's going on, why the byflow is so low, is that the oil companies are not exploring and drilling. Some of that is because of a difficult federal permitting process. Some of that is because of the drilling moritorium. Some of that is because they're sitting on oil leases. Sarah Palin proved that last year when she demanded they start drilling at Pt McKenzie or give back the leases. Lo and behold, they started drilling. Why are they sitting on the leases rather than maximizing the resource? Well, if people like you are under the opinion that TAPS needs to be replaced, then you don't ask why the production is so low. You blame the low production on TAPS rather than on the oil companies.
So why are they holding back on drilling and exploration? Now that's a good question. I haven't heard a good answer, but a theory might be that a scarce resource is worth more than a plentiful resource and that our political environment for decades has built up our expectations of running out of oil and a lot of policies are based on that, with more headed our way.
That's a theory.
Oil production can and does need to be increased, but we really NEED natural gas IN STATE. The oil situation needs attention, but we really need a governor who will move ahead with gas delivery even if the State has to build the line for itself. Recognize that Samuels doesn't think Fairbanks needs to be a part of that. Walker has stated his commitment to Fairbanks getting the gas first. So naturally, I'm voting for the guy who has a plan (Walker) and who thinks Fairbanks shouldn't be left out (Walker).
Parnell has name recognition. That's also what favors Lisa in the Senate race. Most of these polls aren't conducted very well. They ask if you would vote for Parnell, Walker or .... They poll anyone, rather than registered likely voters. That skews the poll because my 17-year-old daughter -- more politically knowledgeable than most teens -- would answer with the name she knows, and she can't even vote.
Primaries in Alaska, though, actually do see some turnover in recent elections. Alaskans pay attention more than they do in most states. I would note that we just entered the campaign season. The biggest number of decisions will be made at the Tanana Valley Fair candidate forum. Sarah Palin was virtually unknown before that forum when she ran against Murkowski; the next day, everybody was talking about her. That's more than a month away.
So we'll see.
Uh oh, Sean's boss Sarah isn't going to like that. Has she endorsed him for the primary yet? I hear crickets.
Parnell is off chasing pie-in-the-sky. The Canadian government hasn't been able to get its own MacKenzie Delta Pipeline through the First Nations---yet he thinks his competing AGIA pipeline will succeed?
Samuels is talking about increasing oil production---but he's not talking about the need for a new oil pipeline to get that oil to market. He's not telling people that it will take ten years to see any profit.
None of them but Walker are pointing out the obvious fact --- we need to get that gas pipeline built and in place BEFORE the oil is gone and we don't have ten years to wait.
Oldowl- Public Safety does wildlife protection- and they issue thousands of citations per year for hunting and fishing violations. Most of their funding is from state dollars- even though you are correct that they do get some federal money.
I don't even disagree with your thesis. But if we risk destroying our economy by failing to bring in new revenue, its going to be the children and the wildlife that will really suffer. Hungry people don't give a rip about hunting laws.
We need new revenue- and Walker is the ONLY one talking about this. 90% of our revenue is from an oil pipeline that is now two thirds empty. If the price of oil had not shot up after we invaded Iraq we wuld already be in big trouble.
Time is not on our side.