Parnell, citing abortions, rejects Denali KidCare expansion
by Christopher Eshleman / ceshleman@newsminer.com
Jun 03, 2010 | 4285 views | 70 70 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print
FAIRBANKS — Gov. Sean Parnell has rejected lawmakers’ plan to expand eligibility for the Denali KidCare program, citing as justification his recent realization the program pays for abortions.

Parnell cut $2.9 million Thursday from the Legislature’s annual spending plans to halt the proposed expansion. Two-thirds would have come from the federal government with the remainder from state coffers.

The Legislature in April voted to expand the program to cover children and pregnant women from families with incomes up to twice the federal poverty level. That would have been an increase from 175 percent of the poverty level.

“I oppose expanding the government’s role in supporting abortion,” Parnell said Thursday of the budget cut. He said he will soon veto a related bill, Senate Bill 13.

Sponsors of the expansion had said the bill would open state health insurance to an additional 1,277 uninsured children and 225 pregnant women. Denali KidCare now covers 7,900 Alaska children.

The sponsors said this spring, as the bill crept through the Legislature, that Denali KidCare is inexpensive and that Alaska is one of a handful of states that doesn’t offer public health assistance for uninsured children at twice the poverty level.

The bill, backed chiefly by Democrats, emerged from a House committee in the Legislature’s final days before clearing the House floor. Parnell, a Republican running for governor this fall, stopped short, when asked by a reporter, of saying he’d look in the future to shrink the program or reshape it after learning money goes to abortions.

Human service groups had trumpeted the bill this fall and word of Thursday’s cut drew swift reaction.

“Our cause is to provide access to care for kids. That’s why we supported the increase, and we’re very disappointed to hear that it was vetoed,” said Cheryl Kilgore, president of the Arctic Alliance and director at the Interior Community Health Center. Democratic lawmakers noted the bill, sponsored by Sen. Bettye Davis, D-Anchorage, had made no mention of abortion.

The state Bureau of Vital Statistics reported in February that 1,875 abortions were reported last year. Of those, one-third were privately paid and 39 percent relied on Medicaid, the agency said.

Planned Parenthood’s Northwest office’s website steers visitors to Denali KidCare for those who lack insurance.

Cathy Stadem, a spokeswoman for the state Department of Health and Social Services, said her office was still, as of late Thursday, determining whether other potential links exist between abortion clinics and state aid beyond Planned Parenthood’s potential acceptance of Denali KidCare funding.

Rep. Mike Kelly, R-Fairbanks, confirmed Thursday he hadn’t been aware that Denali KidCare helps fund abortions in Alaska. Kelly, one of a handful of lawmakers to vote against Senate Bill 13, said his opposition stemmed from a desire to encourage more individual financial responsibility among middle-income families. But he said Parnell’s opinion could prove fuel for future debate over the program.

The bill’s supporters had argued some states offer universal public health care for children and that all but a few offer benefits proposed by Davis’ plan.

Contact staff writer Christopher Eshleman at 459-7582.
Comments
(70)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
oldowl
|
June 05, 2010
Thanks longhornak - it is good to hear another point of view and sometimes it is possible to learn something from that person (like a source of information,etc.) whether you agree or not. But some people can go just too far with the comments. Sometimes hard not to do the same. You were not the one who made the comment - it was Examiner.
longhornak
|
June 05, 2010
And yes oldowl, I do realize you said that you have had a variety of employment. Like I said, no offense was intended.

BTW, I enjoy hearing your side, even if I strongly disagree with it. I learn something new, and once in a blue moon (I am stubborn after all) I change my opinion a tiny bit.
longhornak
|
June 05, 2010
oldowl,

Let them be. There will always be judgemental people out there. I will admit that I am none too fond of the way the government bureaucracy works with regards to hiring/firing/benefits of the employees. However, don't let that take from you. There are many hard-working government employees out there. A lot of those who reached retirement deserve what they got. Some didn't. I don't actually know you, but you seem to fit in the first category.

Invictus and Oh_Please; either you two start playing nice, or I'll send you both to your rooms! :-)
farmnews
|
June 05, 2010
I just discovered invictus doesn’t think I am a part of the state or the government. Apparently I am just a part of we. Well rest assured on Election Day we will be at the polling place being heard and Parnell will be listening. Hopefully we will only provide bad news. I guess he will consider that walking the talk or what the hell ever you call it. Government doesn't belong to the citizens? We'll see.

Invictus
|
June 05, 2010
"You're like the Terminator of turd polishing."

There you go again. Creating an exaggerated, factually misrespresentative image of your fellow citizen.

Why do you hate America?
Oh_please
|
June 05, 2010
but you can count on me to nevah, nevah, nevah give up

Exactly. You're like the Terminator of turd polishing.

twain
|
June 05, 2010
The republicans have finally brought Nancy Reagans advice to heart. They have taken the saying of NO to a fine art.
oldowl
|
June 04, 2010
I do not work for the "public sector". I am not a retired government employee. I have had a variety of employment, some with government and some that was not. So you have no right to judge me as working for one sector when you know nothing.
Invictus
|
June 04, 2010
Buh, buh, buh, buh,...... Iran - Contra!!!!

"If there's anyone out there who knows something about exaggeration and the misrepresentation of facts it's you!"

Well, that's true and thanks for the credit, Oh-please. As you know, I work diligently everyday exposing serial exaggerators and fact misrepresenters like you and CurtJ and a few others. The supporting evidence I provide overwhelms some to the point of heated criticism, but you can count on me to nevah, nevah, nevah give up and to never use cartoons or doctored images to perpetuate a fraud or libel.

Oh_please
|
June 04, 2010
Citations, please Oh-please

Really, Invictus? Really??

Ok... Here ya go: THE IRAN-CONTRA HEARINGS.

Those antics alone are enough to guarantee Reagan a spot in the Hall Of Shame for all eternity.
Invictus
|
June 04, 2010
Citations, please Oh-please.

oldowl -- many of us in the private sector feel that those working in the public sector are on the public dole. I realize this is not the same meaning as "the dole" used to mean back when welfare was a shameful admission of failure and used only as a last resort for as short a time as possible. In consideration of the current gross disparity of payscale between comparable private sector vs public sector jobs, the notion of the public dole takes on new meaning.
oldowl
|
June 04, 2010
This is a note to Mr./ms. Examiner about your rude remarks about my being on the public dole for many years though you do not know me: I have worked over 22 years fulltime jobs paying taxes and Social Security, as well as several more seasonal and parttime work also paying into these programs, paid my way through college,etc. Just FYI!!!! You have no right making your wrong assumptions.

Also this thread has gotten way too far on the abortion issue. I too disfavor abortion for frivolous reasons but the point is funding for medical reasons. Do you still favor no abortion for a woman whom a doctor says may die in childbirth or the child itself? No abortion for your wife who may die or has been raped by another man? No abortion for a woman who is on welfare and adding one more to public assistance ? Yes, I agree with longhornak in teaching our children abstinence, and if they're not going to do that then at least take precautions. Adults should be smarter.
Oh_please
|
June 04, 2010
cartoons never exaggerate or misrepresent facts.Well, I think I may have to defer to your expertise on this one, Invictus...

If there's anyone out there who knows something about exaggeration and the misrepresentation of facts it's you!
bobones83
|
June 04, 2010
invictus- that is a great idea I also think that taking what I said and making it a slippery slope argument would be a good idea!
Invictus
|
June 04, 2010
Oh-please --- you're so right because, as you know, cartoons never exaggerate or misrepresent facts.
Invictus
|
June 04, 2010
bobones -- why stop at pre-birth children? Why not allow mothers to kill their "mistakes" after birth - say to age 16? I say let's give the kids a chance to prove that they're bad or mistakes.
bobones83
|
June 04, 2010
Okay fine they are babies that end up costing everyone else money. Why is it you get free things for making the wrong decisions in the country.
Oh_please
|
June 04, 2010
They believe that abortions should be mandatory. Just like in china.

Exaaaaaactly....

We also hate mom, apple pie and America.

88888
|
June 04, 2010
To all of you who complain that so many children will be denied health care.........

What about the children who will be denied the right to be born?????

It's time for a serious REALITY CHECK!!!!!!!!!
88888
|
June 04, 2010
Bobones83, they're not "mistakes"!!! They're babies!!!!!!!
Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.