Fluoride Task Force has first meeting
by Joshua Armstrong / jarmstrong@newsminer.com
6 months ago | 1077 views | 5 5 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
FAIRBANKS — Bryce Taylor knows that whatever he says about fluoride, it’s going to draw some heat.

“Invariably, there’s going to be that,” the Fairbanks dentist said. “I’m sure both sides (of the issue) will send us a barrage of information.”

Taylor is one of six members of the Fluoride Task Force, which hosted its first meeting Thursday night in the Fairbanks City Council chambers.

The task force was formed to advise the City Council on the benefits and risks of adding fluoride to the public water supply. It is made of six volunteers who are either scientists or medical professionals.

Fairbanks had put fluoride into its water for five decades. The issue has been brought before the City Council before — most recently in 2008 — and proved to be divisive.

Thursday’s meeting revealed no earth-shaking proclamation, as the group deliberated how they would organize information and hear public testimony.

The wealth of information supporting both sides makes matters tough, several members of the task force noted during the meeting.

Taking time to digest all the information will be important to make an informed recommendation to the council, said former University of Alaska Fairbanks dean Joan Braddock, a member of the group.

“If it seems like there’s an easy answer, you probably don’t understand the problem,” she said.

They are led by retired UAF chemistry professor Paul Reichardt. UAF chemistry professor emeritus Dick Stolzberg, UAF economic geology professor Rainer Newberry, Braddock and Taylor were also in attendance. Pediatrician Beth Medford was absent.

The next meeting will be from 7-9:30 p.m. March 16 in the council chambers. Experts selected by Fluoride-Free Fairbanks and the Alaska Dental Society are expected to make presentations and answer questions from the task force.
comments (5)
« use_your_head wrote on Saturday, Mar 06 at 02:57 PM »
just google, yahoo, and wikipedia searches.

My old dentist was adamant about spitting it out and not using more than needed. Said too much was a bad thing.

I would also add that the only times I've ever got cavities and major tooth work done was while I was drinking city water only, with fluroide and chlorine in it.

Completely un-scientific I know but based on my own experiences.
report abuse
« Invictus wrote on Friday, Mar 05 at 05:22 PM »
Extensive regions of Texas and Oklahoma are underlain by rocks rich in flourite. So much so that residents who drink well water have incredibly strong, but brown, discolored teeth. I wonder if incidents of certain cancers are unusually high?

Use_your_head, you claim to know these things. What say you?
report abuse
« use_your_head wrote on Friday, Mar 05 at 05:10 PM »
Let's see, if I want healthy teeth I can brush my teeth of my own accord.

Removing a proven carcinogen from the city's drinking water makes perfect sense, why wasn't it done sooner?
report abuse
« Invictus wrote on Friday, Mar 05 at 10:17 AM »
Will anyone listen to the experts?
report abuse
« chenarose wrote on Friday, Mar 05 at 08:11 AM »
Fluoride-Free Fairbanks. I like that. Good Luck and we are behind you.
report abuse
Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.