Halibut limits ratchet down: Pressure pushes charter and sport fishermen out
by Ken Larson
6 months ago | 1187 views | 5 5 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Community Perspective

The good news is that halibut charter sport fishermen in Southcentral Alaska, including Valdez, will still be able to catch two fish per day and have four fish in possession, at least for 2010.

The bad news is that halibut charter fishermen in Southeast Alaska were forced into a one-fish limit in 2009, and it will continue for the foreseeable future. Further restrictions, such as weekly nonfishing days and seasonal limits, drastically affect charter boat owners, lodge operators and the shore-based businesses that rely on them.

Nonguided halibut sport fishermen in all of Alaska are still able to follow the two- and four-fish limit, for the time being.

Please note that per the Alaska Department of Fish and Game’s published statistics, charter and nonguided halibut sport and subsistence fishermen account for 10-15 percent of the total halibut caught each year. Commercial longliners control the remaining 85-90 percent of the catch, including bycatch.

The commercial longliners have worked under a individual fishing quota permit system, with limited entry, since 1995 when the initial statewide catch limit was set by the International Pacific Halibut Commission at 48.4 million pounds. The commercial IFQ catch limit is adjusted annually by the commission to reflect the health and sustainability of the halibut fishery.

The commercial catch limit peaked in 2003 at 74.4 million pounds and has predictably cycled downward to the present IPHC-mandated catch limit of 50.67 million pounds for 2010. That’s a 6.3 percent decrease from 2009’s 54.08 million-pound catch limit.

It should be noted that these commercial fishing IFQs were issued by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, as recommended by the various commercial-dominated councils — the federal North Pacific Fishery Management Council and the state Board of Fisheries — without much regard to sport fishermen, guided or nonguided, or subsistence users.

The halibut charter fleets in Southeast and Southcentral have been growing since the early 1990s, which resulted in a guideline harvest level being forced on the charter fleet by NOAA in August 2003.

The guideline harvest limit acts like a soft cap, and the management measures mandated by it have led to the one-fish limit in Southeast.

The Southeast charter fleet drastically exceeded its 1.43-million-pound guideline harvest level every year after 2003 by 22.2–114.7 percent.

The Southcentral charter fleet exceeded its 3.65-million-pound guideline harvest level by 0.4–9.6 percent in just four of the years since 2003, and it has been below the guideline harvest since 2007. Hence, it has retained the two-fish limit.

Nevertheless, a moratorium on new charter operator entrants, through a limited entry permit program, has been in the works since about 2003 and will go into effect on Feb. 1, 2011.

The limited entry program will issue permits to charter operators who have a qualifying, logbook-documented catch history in 2004 or 2005 and 2008. Approximately 62 percent of the 854 charter businesses active in Alaska in 2008 will receive limited entry permits in 2010.

In addition to the limited entry program, the federal government’s North Pacific council is implementing a “catch-sharing plan” that is formula-driven based on annual total catch by commercial and sport fishermen. Final rule-making for the catch-sharing plan probably will happen in 2010. The plan likely will reduce the guideline harvest levels by instituting management measures, such as allowing only one fish longer than 32 inches and one fish under 32 inches, or worse. This will bring down the charter sport catch in 2011.

Since nonguided sport fishermen account for more than 35 percent of the sport catch, they, too, likely soon will be targeted for halibut catch restrictions.

Ken L Larson is the past president and current secretary of the Prince William Sound Charter Boat Association and has sport fished in the sound since 1984. He has operated Sanity Charters since 1993.
comments (5)
« pwsfisher wrote on Tuesday, Feb 16 at 08:46 PM »
I keep hearing that Alaskann residents deserve all the fish resources. The State of Alaska receives more Federal dollars, per capita, than any other state in the union. Nevada residents (lowest per capita) would like to know why Alaskans want to keep all their resources to themselves, when the rest of the country is paying for their lifestyle with their taxes. Can you help me understand?

In response to AKrodman: The reason there are no fish in Puget Sound anymore, is because the human beings have totally destroyed the streams, creeks and river systems that salmon need to survive. A healthy eco system is paramount to sustainable fisheries. Do I make myself clear?
report abuse
« fullbush wrote on Monday, Feb 15 at 09:03 AM »
Fishing guides and charter boats are commercial, the clients they carry are the sport fisherman. the ones that lose are us the sportsman. who cares about the guides? They use us true sports man by politically because we're not informed.
report abuse
« use_your_head wrote on Saturday, Feb 13 at 03:15 PM »
I would like to know how the unguided sport fishermen account for that 35%. It sounds like a completely arbitrary number that serves only to restrict resident fishing rights.

The first to reduce their fishing should be the commercial boats. Alaska state Constitution provides our resources be managed to the benefit of Alaskans first, not the lower 48 fish markets.

If they want to regulate the halibut fisheries, ok then. Require all boats to be based and crewed by Alaskans. That would benefit Alaskans and increase jobs for our state.

How about it?
report abuse
« say_what64 wrote on Tuesday, Feb 09 at 10:59 AM »
I find it strange that private Alaskan Citizens continue to lose more access to our own waters. It is illegal in many places for a resident to even set a crab or shrimp pot because the commercial fisheries don't want residents to deplete their stock! Incredible perception, don't you think!

It's the same way with the halibut. Commercial fisheries don't want us catching to much. After all, we could completely devastate their industry! We all know that the fisheries industry does not over fish anything. As far as by-catch goes, I'm sure that those species are all turned back to the sea, alive! They are such caring folks. Besides if we can't catch our own seafood, we have to by theirs. It's a matter of creating a market for the public good. They build it, we will come!

Then there are the subsistence and personal use fisheries that continuously get quota reductions in the number of fish and length of season. I guess the dip netters are catching far more kings than the commercial fleets!
report abuse
« AKrodman1969 wrote on Monday, Feb 08 at 12:30 PM »
Isn't it strange how nearly 40% of Alaskan Charters will be out of business due to the new rules, but the Seattle based long liners will have an increase in catch. This will destroy the economys of many of our coastal towns, and put Alaskans out of work. It is only a matter of time when subsistance and personal use dipnetting is shut down so that Trident and Peter Pan can rape our waters of our great salmon runs. Federal management of any fishery has resulted in nothing but disaster, that is why there aren't any fish in Pugeot Sound anymore. Once again, Feds, bug out. Our state does a damn fine job of managing our own resources.
report abuse
Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.