Bill to criminalize bestiality advances in Alaska Legislature
by Christopher Eshleman / ceshleman@newsminer.com
Jan 26, 2010 | 20527 views | 37 37 comments | 25 25 recommendations | email to a friend | print
JUNEAU - A bill that would criminalize bestiality has continued its path toward state law books.

Supporters say the measure, which cleared the Senate State Affairs Committee today, would close an important gap in Alaska law.

Public animal control commissioners in Fairbanks have lined up unanimously behind the bill, sponsored by Rep. Bob Lynn, R-Anchorage.

Ronnie Rosenberg, the Fairbanks commission's chairwoman, told the State Affairs Commission on Monday that people who work or regularly volunteer at shelters are bound to eventually care for an animal that has been sexually abused by a person. In Fairbanks, an active duty soldier last summer was accused of sodomizing a dachshund that eventually needed medical care and Rosenberg said a more recent case has emerged involving a puppy.

"It's very important that we have the (legal) tools so the troopers can pursue these," Rosenberg said of animal sexual cruelty cases.

The animal cruelty laws already in statute generally make it a misdemeanor to torture or intentionally kill animals outside of standard veterinary care or common farming practices. Lynn's proposed change would add the crime of "knowingly ... engag(ing) in sexual conduct with an animal."

Lynn said studies indicate someone who abuses animals is far more likely that others to move on and abuse children or vulnerable adults.

Rachel Dzuiba, a veterinarian with the Gastineau Humane Society in Juneau, said the bill is well written and would provide one more option to help stop "a cycle of abuse" in Alaska.

The House has already unanimously passed the bill, HB6, which now goes to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Contact staff writer Christopher Eshleman at 459.7582.

Comments
(37)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Scotsman
|
January 28, 2010
Hey News Miner and Eshleman, objection to your deletion of ta2t2's hilarious post (and other related). Humor in the midst of social chaos and group insanity really helps keep things in perspective. Where's your progressive-oriented open mind??
tbear44
|
January 28, 2010
Holy Crap! Don't they have anything more important to do? A "cycle of abuse"? Whatttt??
use_your_head
|
January 28, 2010
Finally, Alaska's wildlife can sleep safely at night knowing deranged individuals aren't crawling through the bush looking for new friends.

Seriously, how deranged do you have to get to think that is a good idea?

Yuck!
chillyagain
|
January 28, 2010
Outstanding and thoughtful comments, ravenvet. Animal abuse needs to come with hefty jail time and a mandate to actually prosecute the cases.
NotTonightDeer
|
January 28, 2010
"Lynn's proposed change would add the crime of KNOWLINGLY... engag(ing)in sexual conduct with an animal".

*Is there a problem with Alaskans UNKNOWINGLY "engaging in sexual conduct with animals"? Did the soldier who "violated" the duchshund, use the excuse that he "DIDN'T KNOW" she was a animal? As an Alaskan, I know the long, cold, dark winter nights can last nine months; but seriously, how could anyone UNKNOWINGLY engage in sex with an animal?? The term "KNOWINGLY" should be removed from the proposed bill! Why? Because when any of these deranged, demented, perverted "Swine Violators" are caught; they will use the term "KNOWINGLY" as a loop hole, to get out of being convicted of criminal bestiality!

*Following is a hypothetical situation. When a "Swine Violator" is caught in the act of bestiality; he/she may use excuses like: "Yes, I was having sex with a Wolverine, a Musk Ox, a Bull Moose, a Sperm Whale, a Mama Grizzly and her three cubs, etc.; BUT NOT "KNOWINGLY"!! Adding excuses like: "I was drunk and I thought the animal was my ex-wife, husband, girlfriend", etc.,. Or, "It was dark! It's been dark for nine frickin' months! How am I supposed to tell the difference between a "Trained Wolverine" and

my wife!!"

Do you see where the terminology: "KNOWINGLY engaging in sexual conduct with an animal", is headed? *Please remove the term "KNOWINGLY" from the proposed criminal bestiality bill. Rewrite the bill to make it a crime for ..."anyone engaging in sexual conduct with an animal".

Also, please make bestiality a felony; not just a misdemeanor.
babylon
|
January 28, 2010
What if I just get the moose a little bit tipsy?
GBob
|
January 28, 2010
Wow, I thought it would have been illegal already, heck we have a law on the books to prevent people from getting a moose drunk...I wonder if it's related...
ravenvet
|
January 27, 2010
In case you have forgotten, the indicent where the male dauchund that was "raped" by a FWA soldier in July was only prosecutable because the federal Uniform Code of Military Justice applied. Had this fellow not been active duty military and on a federal facility, he would have have faced no charges except perhaps a minimal misdeameanor. Now, most likely there's a court martial and time at Ft. Leavenworth in his future. Still, the questions remain...will he receive and respond to counseling (if it is offered or even required) for sexual offenses and will he be required to register as a sex offender?

If this bill passes, what will happen is still a mere misdeameanor without any other consequences.

In the big picture, Alaska puts Big Oil and personal gain ahead of ethics. It's probably important to encourage the Legislature to pass this HB6 because it's better than nothing at all. Really, though, it's pathetic. Many states have done way better regarding animal abuse. When are we?
Pearl=W
|
January 27, 2010
A lot of these comments had me cracking up, but I do agree with 'theabowman', this can be a precursor and/or indicator of much worse to come. I've seen a few instances where this behavior was exhibited to intimidate/threaten a child or family [one using a 12yo girl's pet] that were pretty darn vicious and ugly; and I know some were followed by sexual attacks on children. But all those that I've direct knowledge of were definately chargable under the animal cruelty laws.
Theabowman
|
January 27, 2010
Freeride: the case was in Klawock and the people in Klawock are firmly behind this law. The perp was a two time out of compliance sex abuser of a child. It may not seem like a pressing issue to some but folks who abuse animals in this way are generally pedophiles, rapists and abusers of children and vulnerable adults.
bugmenot2
|
January 27, 2010
Oh wow. They're really taking this backlash against Sarah Palin to the extremes, hitting her where she lives.
oodoodanoo
|
January 27, 2010
If they outlaw bestiality, who will protect all those trees with seductive-looking knotholes?
skitten
|
January 27, 2010
I thought a more pressing problem in Anchorageis the legal question:

If you divorce your wife, is she still your sister?
Buick-Mackane
|
January 27, 2010
"Cass Sunstein, emergency call on line three..."
Freeride_Fairbanks
|
January 27, 2010
I am thinking this stems from the case last year where the convicted sex offended was luring people's dogs into the woods and leashing them while he had his way with them (in Juneau or Ketechikan maybe?). I believe the case was hampered by the fact that while everyone agreed it was wrong, they really didn't have much to charge him with.
Prodigal_Son
|
January 27, 2010
But...., ummm..., like...., what if it's a really attractive critter, wearing a really skanky outfit, misrepresenting its age and species, while acting provocatively in a flirtatious, slutty sort of way??

I mean, isn't every normal human being going to reach their breaking point some times??

Will there be animal psychologists with specific areas of specialty, forensic veterinarians, and animal language interpreters called in to court in order that the accused might face and cross-examine their accuser??

What about victims' rights groups and any associated public funds set aside fro remediation or therapy?

Will the interpreters need to be certified by the court, or is this going to be a lucrative profession that any old horse whisperer can get into??

Should the burlesque-leaning female bunny in 'Who Framed Roger Rabbit' be prosecuted for engaging in what might amount to entrapment??

Are the legislators in Montana or Utah awaer of these laws being crafted?

Will there be different levels of offense for those who violate the rights of domestic (i.e, more trusting and vulnerable) critters, vs. those who offend against the more wild and sometimes-larger critters, that might stand a fighting chance against their offenders?

What about offending against wolves while airborne? Will there be exceptions written into the law for wolves and bears, or other known predators??

These things neeed to be discussed and ironed out, or the attoneys will get rich, and leave the State in a quagmire of legal questions.
axe2grind
|
January 27, 2010
Very serious issue indeed however I think that more should be done to tackle this....phenomenon...

What about cartoon drawings of bestiality - I know some are trying to ban cartoons of inappropriate contact with cartoon minors.

What about sex between non humans, I have seen rabbits try to rape kittens.

What about vegetables? What would you call that - veganality?

If you really think about it there a lot of things that people could potentially get there jollies from. Farm equipment or pastries for instance.

gimmeafreakinbreak
|
January 27, 2010
Guess there's gonna be a sale on peanut butter.
Runway
|
January 26, 2010
This should be among the top 5 offenses in the sick-o-sphere, punishable by by castration, abundant public service and extensive psychotherapy.
chulio
|
January 26, 2010
I always thought that when someone was accused of "s....ing the pooch" that it was just a crude insult about stupid actions, maybe by legislators for instance. I had no idea that it was a real problem.

This should take 2 minutes. "All those in favor of a law against bestiality, say 'aye'. Those opposed, 'nay'. The motion carries unanimously. Bestiality, in all forms, is now illegal in the state of Alaska, punishable by prison and public scorn. Now let's get to energy legislation."
Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.