Supporters say the measure, which cleared the Senate State Affairs Committee today, would close an important gap in Alaska law.
Public animal control commissioners in Fairbanks have lined up unanimously behind the bill, sponsored by Rep. Bob Lynn, R-Anchorage.
Ronnie Rosenberg, the Fairbanks commission's chairwoman, told the State Affairs Commission on Monday that people who work or regularly volunteer at shelters are bound to eventually care for an animal that has been sexually abused by a person. In Fairbanks, an active duty soldier last summer was accused of sodomizing a dachshund that eventually needed medical care and Rosenberg said a more recent case has emerged involving a puppy.
"It's very important that we have the (legal) tools so the troopers can pursue these," Rosenberg said of animal sexual cruelty cases.
The animal cruelty laws already in statute generally make it a misdemeanor to torture or intentionally kill animals outside of standard veterinary care or common farming practices. Lynn's proposed change would add the crime of "knowingly ... engag(ing) in sexual conduct with an animal."
Lynn said studies indicate someone who abuses animals is far more likely that others to move on and abuse children or vulnerable adults.
Rachel Dzuiba, a veterinarian with the Gastineau Humane Society in Juneau, said the bill is well written and would provide one more option to help stop "a cycle of abuse" in Alaska.
The House has already unanimously passed the bill, HB6, which now goes to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Contact staff writer Christopher Eshleman at 459.7582.


Seriously, how deranged do you have to get to think that is a good idea?
Yuck!
*Is there a problem with Alaskans UNKNOWINGLY "engaging in sexual conduct with animals"? Did the soldier who "violated" the duchshund, use the excuse that he "DIDN'T KNOW" she was a animal? As an Alaskan, I know the long, cold, dark winter nights can last nine months; but seriously, how could anyone UNKNOWINGLY engage in sex with an animal?? The term "KNOWINGLY" should be removed from the proposed bill! Why? Because when any of these deranged, demented, perverted "Swine Violators" are caught; they will use the term "KNOWINGLY" as a loop hole, to get out of being convicted of criminal bestiality!
*Following is a hypothetical situation. When a "Swine Violator" is caught in the act of bestiality; he/she may use excuses like: "Yes, I was having sex with a Wolverine, a Musk Ox, a Bull Moose, a Sperm Whale, a Mama Grizzly and her three cubs, etc.; BUT NOT "KNOWINGLY"!! Adding excuses like: "I was drunk and I thought the animal was my ex-wife, husband, girlfriend", etc.,. Or, "It was dark! It's been dark for nine frickin' months! How am I supposed to tell the difference between a "Trained Wolverine" and
my wife!!"
Do you see where the terminology: "KNOWINGLY engaging in sexual conduct with an animal", is headed? *Please remove the term "KNOWINGLY" from the proposed criminal bestiality bill. Rewrite the bill to make it a crime for ..."anyone engaging in sexual conduct with an animal".
Also, please make bestiality a felony; not just a misdemeanor.
If this bill passes, what will happen is still a mere misdeameanor without any other consequences.
In the big picture, Alaska puts Big Oil and personal gain ahead of ethics. It's probably important to encourage the Legislature to pass this HB6 because it's better than nothing at all. Really, though, it's pathetic. Many states have done way better regarding animal abuse. When are we?
If you divorce your wife, is she still your sister?
I mean, isn't every normal human being going to reach their breaking point some times??
Will there be animal psychologists with specific areas of specialty, forensic veterinarians, and animal language interpreters called in to court in order that the accused might face and cross-examine their accuser??
What about victims' rights groups and any associated public funds set aside fro remediation or therapy?
Will the interpreters need to be certified by the court, or is this going to be a lucrative profession that any old horse whisperer can get into??
Should the burlesque-leaning female bunny in 'Who Framed Roger Rabbit' be prosecuted for engaging in what might amount to entrapment??
Are the legislators in Montana or Utah awaer of these laws being crafted?
Will there be different levels of offense for those who violate the rights of domestic (i.e, more trusting and vulnerable) critters, vs. those who offend against the more wild and sometimes-larger critters, that might stand a fighting chance against their offenders?
What about offending against wolves while airborne? Will there be exceptions written into the law for wolves and bears, or other known predators??
These things neeed to be discussed and ironed out, or the attoneys will get rich, and leave the State in a quagmire of legal questions.
What about cartoon drawings of bestiality - I know some are trying to ban cartoons of inappropriate contact with cartoon minors.
What about sex between non humans, I have seen rabbits try to rape kittens.
What about vegetables? What would you call that - veganality?
If you really think about it there a lot of things that people could potentially get there jollies from. Farm equipment or pastries for instance.
This should take 2 minutes. "All those in favor of a law against bestiality, say 'aye'. Those opposed, 'nay'. The motion carries unanimously. Bestiality, in all forms, is now illegal in the state of Alaska, punishable by prison and public scorn. Now let's get to energy legislation."