State of Alaska in need of more Village Public Safety Officers
by Sam Friedman / sfriedman@newsminer.com
Jan 15, 2012 | 4806 views | 28 28 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Correction: Starting salary for a VPSO is $62,624.52 in his first six months. An incorrect figure was used earlier versions of this story.


FAIRBANKS — The money and the political support will exist to expand the number of Village Public Safety Officers to every Alaskan village that wants one by 2019, but it has taken time to find qualified candidates for the remote posts.

VPSOs work with Alaska State Troopers, but they wear brown uniforms instead of blue and only occasionally the troopers’ characteristic Stetson hat.

Professionally, they wear four hats: peace officer, fire chief, wilderness search and rescue leader and medic. They do not carry service firearms but do have the power to make arrests.

The year 2011 was the third year of a 10-year program to add 15 VPSO positions every year. It’s a central part of Gov. Sean Parnell’s “Safe Homes, Strong Families” campaign to reduce Alaska’s high domestic violence rates.

The program was slow to find applicants for newly created positions, adding only four new officers in fiscal year 2010.

“It’s not for the lack of trying,” said Sgt. Leonard Wallner who coordinates the VPSO program statewide. “It’s about finding people who can pass the background check and go thorough the rigors of a 10-week police academy. It’s not an easy undertaking.”

2011 was a better year for recruitment, with 16 new officers.

The class of 2012 of VPSO training program begins its third of 10 weeks Monday at the Department of Public Safety Academy in Sitka. The pipeline of new candidates attending the academy has expanded significantly every year in the past four, going from 5 in 2008 to 38 this year, Wallner said.

Interior VPSOs

Regional Native nonprofit corporations manage the VPSO program in most of the state. For the Interior, the work is contracted to the Fairbanks-based Tanana Chiefs Conference.

If you include candidates for Northway and Tetlin at the VPSO academy, there are eight VPSOs in the region, said TCC public safety director Jim Knopke. Also covered are the villages of Ruby, Huslia, Arctic Village, Beaver, Tanana and Eagle.

The goal is to expand to 24 Interior VPSOs within the first half of the VPSO expansion project, he said. Now in the works are the villages of Allakaket, Yukon Flats and Nenana.

For comparison, about 20 troopers patrol the Bush and rural highway areas of the same region.

Knopke said recruitment dropped about six or seven years ago and has begun to improve over the past two years. Law enforcement has nationally followed a similar pattern, and he attributes it to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

“A lot of applicants that we’d normally see are in the military instead,” he said.

VPSOs on the job are also staying longer, a dramatic improvement during past 10 years. Knopke attributed the better retention to higher salaries and better infrastructure for VPSOs to use.

Pay starts at $62,624.52 for a new VPSO in his first six months, but a VPSO who stays on the job receives regular annual raises, he said.

There’s also plenty of potential for advancement. Current Alaska Public Safety Commissioner Joseph A. Masters started his career as a Village Public Safety Officer, Knopke said.

In general, Knopke said, TCC “champions” trying to recruit candidates from within a village or within the region where he or she will be serving. But some candidates from outside the region or even the state make good VPSOs. One example, he said, is Huslia VPSO Cpl. Tim Pavlick, who is from Allentown, Penn., but has won the support of his adopted community.

Pavlick met a woman from Huslia when he was in the Army and stationed at Fort Wainwright.

They got married and moved to Huslia, where Pavlick has now been VPSO for 10 years.

Contact staff writer Sam Friedman at 459-7545.
Comments
(28)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
teapartypatriot_2
|
January 16, 2012
With the stupid arrest made for trading moose meat for fire wood, I don't see why anyone would want to have anything to do with these guys. They are out of line and over the top. Also the survey taken in 2000 by a UAA professor revealed that 21 percent of the VSPO's are on food stamps. These jobs are not good jobs.
teapartypatriot_2
|
January 15, 2012
March 200 Survey:

The survey of current and former VPSOs focused upon four topic areas thought to be

associated with officer turnover. First of all, the officers were questioned about their pay and

cost of living expenses. Both subjective and objective measures appear to indicate that VPSOs

are underpaid.

teapartypatriot_2
|
January 15, 2012
Five out of six VPSOs felt that they are not paid very well while more than nine out of ten were of the opinion that VPSOs earn much less than the job is worth.

The majority (60 %) of VPSOs reported doing something to supplement their incomes.

More than 20 percent of the officers reported using food stamps while in the program, and 48 percent of the officers reported working an extra job while employed as a VPSO.



VPSO housing is expensive; nearly two-thirds (63 %) of the VPSOs reported paying more than one-third of their salaries toward housing.

Only a slim majority (51 %) of VPSOs were satisfied with the quality of their housing.

from:

http://justice.uaa.alaska.edu/research/1990/9901vpso/9901summ.pdf
teapartypatriot_2
|
January 15, 2012
$22,630 a year for a new VPSO is peanuts. How can anyone expect to hire people for this ridiculous salary? For 37.5 hr week and 50 weeks per year this comes to $12.70 an hour! After taxes it comes to about $9 an hour. A person can make more shoveling snow in Valdez. Governor Parnell is a cheap skate, two bit politician that does not have a clue.

When Partnell was an oil company lobbyist I bet he made close to $250 an hour.

wild-alaska
|
January 15, 2012
Reality Check!!!! When you are a VPSO in a small village, you are on call 24/7. Everyone knows where you live and if something goes down people come to your home. Do you turn down people who need help, no you help them. That is why it is hard to get VPSO's, pay is crap and the job is dangerous. Don't even talk about being white, that would most likely get you killed.
VRae609
|
January 16, 2012
"Pay starts at $22,630 for a new VPSO in his first six months, but a VPSO who stays on the job receives regular annual raises, he said."

it's not $22,630/year it's a half a year then receives regular annual raises

akanon
|
January 15, 2012
No wonder more VPSO's are needed, who would take a job where no one likes you, backup is nonexistent or hours away, and you might have to respond to a scene where your life depends on a firearm that you don't have! Brilliant.
oldowl
|
January 15, 2012
Yes these officers have a rough time and are to be much admired. Could someone please enlighten me on why they cannot carry a gun? Would that up their pay scale? They need them.
Underminer
|
January 15, 2012
Everyone should carry guns..."law officers" included!
Lyoto_M
|
January 15, 2012
VPSO is the toughest job in the village to hold and maintain. Your the most hated individual and it comes with alot of stress. Since the village is small there is alot of politics too, so i understand why you'd not want to be a VPSO.

Especially if Doyon, Veco, and other orgs are paying higher for security guards.
andora@nushtel.net
|
January 15, 2012
VPSOs, in my view, are heroes! They have a tough job and need a lot of community support and encouragement. I believe that VPSOs are not armed and are often without necessary equipment, community support, inadequate quarters, and substandard jails to hold suspects.

Governor has been adding more VPSOs to the service and more needs to be done to make sure that all of our communities in Alaska are guaranteed safety in their own homes.

And, the VPSO Program should be the gateway for entry into the State Trooper service to give VPSOs upward mobility and encourage more Alaskans to get into and stay in law enforcement all across Alaska.

I urge the Governor and Legislature to add more VPSOs and make it possible for current VPSOs and future officers to move into the State Trooper Corp.

Underminer
|
January 15, 2012
While I am not native, I tend to agree with what you say. I say it is time to take back your villages, only you, your elders and villagers are able to do what is right for your homes. When you do this, never ask the state for help again. When you ask the devil for help, he will enter your lives and will refuse to leave.
thewatermanak
|
January 15, 2012
To impose "White society on Native people is to make them ALL criminals" These criminals can not own guns, can not hunt and can not carry on their traditions as a people. The "white laws are for one reason" to destory the way of life that has been good to these people for thousands of years.
88888
|
January 15, 2012
Thewatermanak, your remarks reveal a lot of bitterness.

White people have no interest in destroying the Natives' way of life. What would be the reason to do so?

If the "way of life that has been good to these people for thousands of years" was so wonderful, then why have all Native people so readily embraced what you would call white culture? Nearly every home has television, video games, snowmachines, guns (not a Native invention), computers, stoves, pots and pans, western style clothing, cell phones, canned and packaged foods, etc., etc., etc. No-one is forcing the Native people to buy these things, or to use them.

It's time for people like yourself to be honest about life. If there is crime in the village, it is not the white man's fault. People need to accept responsibility for their actions. If a man beats up a woman, or molests a child, or gets drunk and shoots his brother, that man is at fault, and he needs to be held accountable. That is the purpose of the VPSO program
paradox911
|
January 15, 2012
88888, THANK YOU ,YOUR RIGHT.
Underminer
|
January 15, 2012
Thewatermanak, "your remarks reveal a lot of bitterness.

White people have no interest in destroying the Natives' way of life. What would be the reason to do so?"

What would be the reason to do so???? CONTROL, you morons!!

Yota99714
|
January 15, 2012
If it were that 'thousands of years' my good fellow citizen, then that was LONG BEFORE GUNS.

paradox911, I hear your story a lot, and offer my condolences to you and those in your situation.

It's not as cut and dried as what some people think.
thewatermanak
|
January 15, 2012
Villages DO NOT NEED more cops! They need to be released from the hold of state and federal law enforcement to go back to their tribal form of law and punishment. Banishment is a far better determent than a warm confortable jail. When the elders had control of crime there was much less crime against their own people. Let the village elders set the punishment of those who commit crimes.Imposing "white society" on the villages is the biggest mistake and crime against the people of the north country that the state of Alaska has ever commited in order to steal their heratige!
steveconn
|
January 15, 2012
With due respect, it's not either or. Both tribal and state could work productively together. Both must share authority. The idea that problems have not arrived in village Alaska that the present

allocation of resources cannot manage was dismissed by the AVCP as far back as 1969. The issue is really makes decisions about the villages. Eban Hopson snatched away authority within the boroug as soon as he had the resources to do so. We need to play the cards as dealt and not wish for a return to a past no longer is. Both the state and the villages must do this.
paradox911
|
January 15, 2012
WELL/Get This,IF your first born son is kill;ed in a village,like my son was,The outside law can't get nothing from the person;s, there because the rest are liveing in fear of the one that killed my son,you all that live in the city ,have some one to turn to, the village's don't,so asking for law to be in the remote village is a crime ? yes thewatermanak,your right on some point's but on this one your not, my son was kill the 15th of jan last year,and i had to clean up the home were he was killed, and i know who killed him, but i can't take the law into my own hand's, and my wife is still crying,And still do i. so if the state of ak would have law officer's in the village's ,my son's killer mite of gone to jail, not free to kill other's,like it is now . right now the village's that don't have officer's have more crime, and killer's don't fear killing other's .And I have to live knowing who kill'ed my son is free to harm other's .
mcgillagorilla
|
January 15, 2012
i wonder why not one level of law enforcement for all alaska. do we need two or three levels to enforce the law.the vpso can not carry a weapon but can make arrests what kind of idiot made that law. also if you have to be native to be one that seems to me to be descrimination and should be decided in a court of law. why not the state police with one level and let everyone apply and try out for the positions. or is that too hard to understand for the idiots in the capitol
TheAntiClinger
|
January 15, 2012
I'm sorry but you get a big D on this comment. Where is my red pencil?

Let's see, there's very poor capitalization, missing punctuation, and very poor reading comprehension there MG. Did you do any of your homework?
islandliver
|
January 15, 2012
You do not have to be native to be a VPSO. You just have to be willing to live in one of those smaller communities.

The VPSO program is only a way to allow smaller locations to have some level of law enforcement on site. The alternative had been expecting Troopers to be dispatched to those locations. That alternative resulted in Troopers getting on site if the weather allowed them to get there. Issues like a domestic violence need immediate assistance and waiting a few days for the Trooper is not acceptable.

The third level you refer to are local police. Local communities can have many enforceable ordinances that are simply not currently enforceable by Troopers. Additionally cities with police departments can establish what level of staffing they are willing to pay for. For Example: if residents chose to have officers patrolling an area constantly they get to pay for that service.
steveconn
|
January 15, 2012
Sorry, the VPSO program, the troopers who need the bush as their remaining jurisdiction (other than the North Slope) and the regional non-profits who profit from the continuing program, need to step aside. Alaska Natives need to be hired and trained as real police. The days of using locals as colonial police to wait for real police are over. Trouble has found its way into too many villages through improved infrastructure. A working relationship with tribal people can keep a balance. Canadian police who invented the VPSO concept have long abandoned it.
FishinforTuition
|
January 15, 2012
And evidently a few more VPSO's are needed in Anchorage, Fairbanks, Juneau, and Petersburg too.

Fish and Game has suffered under the last two administrations. Rossi's alleged violations are the worst, but DUI and reckless driving arrests of then-Commissioner Denby Lloyd and department spokeswoman Jennifer Yuhas didn't help.

Can we find a few more criminals to hire for government work, like Arnie Fuglov for Murkowsi, Llyod for Palin and Rossi, and Campbell for Parnell too?

It's quite the concept, law, in a Department of Law and Public Safety where the criminal accomplished is a job duty and description, shown in every State Political Subdivisison.

My '85 academy class had the FBI show up in Sitka and hauled off a cadet in an orange jumpsuit, leg irons and chains. As squad leader, I always thought this man was of questionable Intregrity, by his actions and words.

Todays Rossi, with an outside agency doing the Alaska State Troopers job...what a concept!

doubledumb
|
January 15, 2012
Fro some reason they just can not seem to find residents in these locations to fill the job......why's that? Tanana could probably use 10 more.
MP210
|
January 15, 2012
Maybe you could take the job, and pull double duty
june69
|
January 15, 2012
yep, thats the answer, send in more enforcement to teach people how to act, dont educate, discuss or remedy just send in some law enforcement. They enforce, just like military coming into a part of the world where they act less than civil (based on someone elses standards of course). Thats how you view these thing double d? That mentality will most surely result in the same coming to your front door, maybe sooner than later.
Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.