Challenges abound for new Tanana rail bridge
by Christopher Eshleman / ceshleman@newsminer.com
Nov 15, 2010 | 5061 views | 17 17 comments | 25 25 recommendations | email to a friend | print
FAIRBANKS —The state railroad says a planned bridge across the Tanana River is so big that contractors are scratching their heads about how they’ll build it and where they’ll find the material.

The bridge, more than a half-mile long, will be the largest in the state. It will connect the highway near Salcha to 1.2 million acres of military training ground south of the river, an area now reachable only by ice bridge or aircraft.

Construction is set to start next year and last into 2015. Brian Lindamood, a project manager for the Alaska Railroad Corp., acknowledged last week that there are many variables in the final plan.

The huge rocks needed to buttress the northern riverbank must come from somewhere. And there’s the bigger question of where to build the 80 12-foot-tall steel beams needed once work begins. Lindamood told a Fairbanks Chamber of Commerce committee that each beam will be 165 feet long and weigh 60 tons.

Contractors will need to find answers this winter.

Once construction arrives, it’ll be tough for Salcha to ignore. The project could attract 150 sets of hands on any given summer workday.

“We’re going to be spending six figures a month just to keep the lights on out there,” Lindamood said.

The project is all but financed, given a series of federal grants and one from the state Legislature. A final price tag should arrive by year’s end.

The tentative cost: $160 million.

The bridge will accommodate trucks and trains, with rail embedded in the roadway. It’s planned as the first act in a larger production, an 80-mile, $700-plus million expansion of the railroad to Delta Junction from its endpoint at Eielson Air Force Base.

The bridge’s tentative lead contractor is Nebraska-based Kiewit, although contract negotiations continue.

The bridge will sit on hammerhead, 10-foot-diameter column foundations. Each of those will in turn rest on a 576-square-foot pad supported by six-foot-diameter pilings sunk 110 feet into the riverbed.

“With piles that size, you don’t just go out and get a regular piledriving hammer,” Lindamood said. A big one is needed. “There’s a handful of them floating around the world. The last time we checked, the nearest one was in Singapore.”

Lindamood said by phone Monday that the contractor will need to import steel beams from the West Coast or Asia. Managers have talked about shipping them to the Kenai Peninsula. The railroad’s southern terminus is Seward. The barges also could land in Valdez, where trucks would drive the steel north, Lindamood said.

Enormous rocks would buttress a levee along the river’s northern bank. That would address the Tanana’s wandering nature and, in the process, protect scores of properties from floods. Lindamood said managers canvassed the Interior for the best and cheapest sources of rock, identifying a half-dozen sites between Fairbanks and Delta Junction. He said it’s proving tough to find spots that can offer that much stone while staying within budget.

Lindamood said the regulatory review surrounding the bridge project is also providing a challenge, with federal agencies pressing to know more about how the work could affect the environment. The Federal Emergency Management Agency also doesn’t like risk, he said. Lindamood said the number of questions illustrates the daunting nature of such a big project.

“It’s very difficult to go stand on the bank of the Tanana River and really get a sense of scope,” he said.

Contact staff writer Christopher Eshleman at 459-7582.

Comments
(17)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
seven51
|
November 16, 2010
Leave out 1 did
seven51
|
November 16, 2010
out-in-the-cold---I remember when the hansen bridge was built. I also remember when the old hansen bridge was in operation. It had a wood deck, and was one way for a few years. Our nickname for it was the swinging bridge because it did definitely did swing in the wind.
Yota99714
|
November 16, 2010
Samm_redux,

Private property has already been bought up along the current bridge site, so your point is moot with regard to the Flag Hill area. The rock there isn't like the junk along the other bluffs in our area. And the ground is still higher on the other side there, unlike at the current site.

Miledr,

There was already $$ earmarked in the DOD budget a couple years ago for the bridge itself, so that's already been done as well. This phase is comprised of building the bridge and building up the road to handle traffic to the bridge site off the Rich Hwy. Other $$ is for linking the rail at North Pole to go on out to the site.
Stir_the_pot
|
November 16, 2010
And while we're at it, lets get the railroad and roads built to Nome and the north slope. We need to be ready for the year round shipping that will be taking place since the polar ice cap is melting away permanently.
out_in_the_cold
|
November 16, 2010
Kiewit has built some bridges before around the world. How about the Hanson bridge across the Snake River canyon near Twin Falls, Idaho?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/80651083@NOO/175525861/

Might be easier to barge the steel beams up the Yukon and Tanana River, if they can get from Nenana to Salcha .. than landing in Valdez and trucking over Thompson Pass.

Now for the head scratching .. What head?
Charliebussell
|
November 16, 2010
Excellent project for Alaskan's....and now on to Susitna Hydro....we need them both and need them now...we have the money, we have the work force, we have the need, and now have to all get on the same end of the wagon and get the job done...
Samm_redux
|
November 16, 2010
mileder... Most of the cost IS being covered by the DOD. The rest is being bonded (remember the election approving the bond?) to be paid from RR revenues.

Yota99714 ... The rock at Flag Hill is privately owned... if it is suitable (and there is a likelihood that it is NOT) the contractor can buy it from the owner.
spaceman
|
November 16, 2010
We built a pipeline from one of this State to the other across tundra, mountains, and rivers. We can surely build a bridge across a river. I helped build the bridge across the Yukon. The Tanana is no big deal.
Ak_man
|
November 16, 2010
mcgillagorilla

you got it wrong.

lets build, you sound like a miller fan. even miller wants to develope alaskan resources that will in turn need some way to get them to the market. a railroad sounds like a good way.

and even though people don't understand how countries come out of the economic situation we are in. the main way is CREATE JOBS. this creates jobs. lots of them. I'm hoping to get on this project considering i've worked for kewit and got a place to stay in salcha. and it will be paying good money
mcgillagorilla
|
November 16, 2010
yep by all means build a bridge across the tanana river when our alaska railroad is barely in the black one more hiccup in the economy and the railroad will be wanting to get into the permant fund like the politicans. railroads cost about a million dollers a mile to build and to everyone who says build one to canada have you looked at a map and how far would you have to build one to connect to a existing rail road. by all means lets spend ourselves into debt like the federal goverment.who cares that our children and grand children will be indebted to the chinese,because of the politicans spending millions and not giveing a darn about our country.
hrdharry
|
November 16, 2010
I hope the hire locally.
mileder
|
November 16, 2010
If the military wants a RR bridge so they can take a train to their property then the money should come out of the military budget. It's better than buying cluster bombs, I'd say.
unsolicited_opinion
|
November 16, 2010
The U.S. government formed an international commission to investigate the building of a rail link through the Yukon to connect the Alaska railroad with the rest of the North American Rail Network. Canada was asked to be part of the commission, but chose not to join or commit funds for the study, however the Yukon government is interested. A 2006 report recommended Carmacks, Yukon as a hub. A line would go northward to Delta Junction, Alaska. Another line would go from Carmacks to Hazelton, British Columbia. That line would go through Watson Lake, Yukon and Dease Lake along the way. A third line would go from Carmacks to either Haines or Skagway, via Whitehorse, Yukon.
ChenaSteamer
|
November 16, 2010
Excellent project. Rail is a vital link in transportation and is very cost effective. This bridge is the first of many projects to eventualy link Alaska to the lower 48 by rail.
Yota99714
|
November 15, 2010
If these dummies would've put the crossing west of Flag Hill, then they'd have all the bull rock and high ground they needed, but nooo..body listened to the locals....

You were entertaining bringing up rock from Cantwell; what happened with that? Shoot, just drive around Salcha and pick up dead vehicle carcasses, squish 'em and use those instead. The silt will finish filling them in, and you'll find enough material, LOL!!

So 110ft deep for pilings is what they came up with? Wow. You could afford to put a bridge across the Salcha for that, and still get to Flag Hill.

Yee-freakin'-haw.
Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.