Volunteers, biologist take on invasive white sweet clover

Published Saturday, July 26, 2008

Mike Spindler, refuge manager for the Kanuti National Wildlife Refuge, examines the roots of a white sweet clover plant he just pulled along the Dalton Highway on Tuesday, July 22. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is helping to fund an effort to prevent the non-native invasive species from spreading into refuge, where it could displace willows, an important food for moose, on gravel bars.
A tractor-trailer rolls by on the Dalton Highway as Mike Spindler of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, front, and Betty Siegel, a volunteer with Friends of Alaska National Wildlife Refuges, pull up white sweet clover plants, in pile, along the road on Tuesday, July 22, as part of an effort to keep the non-native invasive species from spreading into Kanuti National Wildlife Refuge. Ruth Cronquist, back, a wildlife biologist with the Bureau of Land Management, is coordinating the effort.
Tom Balland, of Homer, points to a white sweet clover seedling  along the Dalton Highway on Tuesday, July 22. Balland, a volunteer with Friends of Alaska Wildlife Refuges, is helping to pull up the weeds as part of an effort to prevent the non-native invasive species from spreading into Kanuti National Wildlife Refuge.

MILE 135, DALTON HIGHWAY — An occasional tractor-trailer rumbled by at 60 mph as Tom Balland, wearing a bright orange reflective vest, crawled around on the shoulder of the Dalton Highway near Prospect Creek pulling weeds.

The trucks, hauling equipment and supplies to the North Slope oil fields, are a common sight on the Haul Road, as the Dalton Highway is affectionately called by Alaskans.

So, too, is the weed that Balland was pulling.

It’s called white sweet clover, and it is one of 65 plants that has been identified as a non-native invasive species in Alaska.

“We missed one here,” Balland said, proudly displaying the small, green-leafed plant between his thumb and forefinger. “You can go through here 50 times and you’re still going to miss some.”

Dropping the plant, Balland resumed his search, combing the gravel as if he were looking for a contact lens.

“Here’s another one,” he said, triumphantly pulling up another of the tiny weeds. “And another one. And another one.”

For the last three years, volunteers like Balland, who works with a group called Friends of Alaska National Wildlife Refuges, have been pulling white sweet clover plants up along the Dalton Highway as part of a grass-roots effort to keep the weed from spreading into the Kanuti National Wildlife Refuge.

“What we want to do is keep it from getting into rivers and spreading west into the wilderness,” Kanuti refuge manager Mike Spindler said, as he helped Balland and three other volunteers yank up weeds during a visit on Tuesday. “Once the seed source gets in the river, the flood waters will spread it everywhere.”

There are six rivers that cross the Dalton Highway and flow into the 1.6-million-acre refuge north of Fairbanks — the Kanuti River, Fish Creek, Bonanza Creek, Prospect Creek, the Jim River, the South Fork of Koyukuk and the Middle Fork of Koyukuk.

Refuge officials are worried that white sweet clover will find its way into the refuge and take over gravel bars in the Koyukuk River drainage, Spindler said. It could out-compete willows, which are a valuable food source for moose, he said. Infestations of the weed have already been found on gravel bars on rivers in Southeast, Southcentral and Interior Alaska.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has been providing funding to the Bureau of Land Management for the past three years to pay for the weed-pulling effort. The BLM manages the land along both sides of the Dalton Highway north of the Yukon River.

“We’re spending $20,000 a year,” Spindler said. “That’s a pretty small investment, and it’s probably worth it until we do more research to figure out what we’re going to do if it hits gravel bars.”

Growing problem

On an “invasiveness scale” of 0 to 100 with 100 being the worst, white sweet clover scores “in the 80s,” according to BLM wildlife biologist Ruth Gronquist, who is leading that agency’s effort to control the spread of the weed.

The plant, along with its close cousin yellow sweet clover, was introduced to Alaska in 1913 as a potential forage crop, according to Jeff Conn, a research agronomist and weed scientist for the USDA.

Today, white sweet clover can be found along most of the road systems in Alaska from the Kenai Peninsula to the Brooks Range. It is common along the Parks, Richardson and Dalton highways and in most communities along the road system, including Fairbanks.

“You look around (Fairbanks) and you see it all over the place,” Spindler said.

White sweet clover jumped the Yukon River seven years ago and has been found as far north as Coldfoot, a Haul Road truck stop about 250 miles north of Fairbanks. Like most invasive plants, white sweet clover is “very opportunistic,” Gronquist said.

“I’ve only been looking at it on the Dalton Highway since 2004 but I can tell you it’s been an exponential spread,” she said. “Roads are perfect vectors for the spread of invasive plants.”

Dubbed “the pest with the pretty name,” white sweet clover has a two-year life cycle. The first year it develops a deep tap root and the second year it flowers and produces seeds. Each plant has the ability to produce as many as 350,000 seeds, making it extremely prolific. Roots of mature plants can be more than a foot long and resemble a full-size parsnip.

Invasive plants like white sweet clover are a growing problem in Alaska, where researchers are just beginning to catalog and study them. Invasive plants can shade out and replace native plants, changing entire ecosystems. White sweet clover, for example, adds nitrogen to the soil, which changes soil and plant chemistry.

So far, 65 plants have been identified as non-native invasive species in Alaska, including commonly found plants like dandelions, bird vetch, oxeye daisy, pineapple weed and foxtail barley.

“We’re finding more every year,” Gronquist said.

She leaned over and pulled up a yellow-flowering plant called narrowleaf hawksbeard that is becoming more common in Alaska.

“We call this the next dandelion,” she said.

Planting the seed

Rivers aren’t the only way white sweet clover could infiltrate the refuge, Spindler said. Airplanes and boats could also transport seeds into the refuge.

Last year, Spindler and a crew floated down the Kanuti River looking for white sweet clover on gravel bars and didn’t find any.

“This year we’re going to float the Jim River and the South Fork of the Koyukuk to look for it,” he said.

So far, the spread of white sweet clover has been limited mostly to roadsides and disturbed areas, such as construction sites. The weed flourishes in gravel, or what agronomist researcher Steve Seefeldt with the U.S. Department of Agriculture in Fairbanks called “basic soil.”

“Once it gets off the road bed it’s dealing with more of an acid soil,” he said. “Once it gets to acid soil and can’t make its own nitrogens, it sort of loses its advantages.”

While white sweet clover extends for more than 150 miles on the Haul Road, the weed-pulling effort has been concentrated at river crossings

In addition to pulling weeds, this year workers experimented by using weed whackers to remove and inhibit first-year growth. Another option that has yet to be tried is re-seeding areas with more aggressive native grasses to out-compete the weeds.

A two-week, weed-pulling campaign each year, though, isn’t going to be enough to prevent the spread of white sweet clover, Gronquist acknowledged. As she drove along the highway on Tuesday, Gronquist pointed out mature plant after mature plant.

“There’s a second-year plant,” she said, passing a four-foot-high flowering plant. “If we don’t pull that one, then next year there will be a one meter by one meter mat of seedlings under it.”

Making a difference

This is the fourth trip that Betty Siegel has made to the Brooks Range to pull white sweet clover along the Dalton Highway. Siegel is the volunteer coordinator for the Homer-based Friends of Alaska National Wildlife Refuges.

“It’s become a mission for me now,” Siegel said, crawling around near Prospect Creek searching for young plants on a cold, soggy day in the Brooks Range.

Siegel, a 68-year-old retired social worker who moved to Homer from San Diego three years ago, said programs like the weed-pulling effort allow volunteers to see different parts of the state while contributing to a good environmental cause. The BLM pays for volunteers’ travel, food and lodging expenses.

“I really do care so much about the refuges,” she said.

This is the first time Balland, a retired state sport fish biologist from Homer, joined the weed-pulling crew on the Dalton Highway. Balland, 56, is hopeful he and the others can make a difference.

“It’s something to be very concerned about,” he said. “Any of these invasive plants have the potential of totally changing the landscape as we know it, both flora and fauna.”

Last year, a team of about a dozen volunteers filled plastic garbage bags with 3 1/2 tons of white sweet clover, which was then burned.

After three years of weed pulling, Siegel is optimistic that volunteers are having an impact.

“I was down on my hands and knees redoing an area that I did a month ago and there were so many fewer plants and they’re pretty small,” she said.

Gronquist, too, thinks the weed pulling has made a difference, at least in the areas around the river crossings.

“We can’t eradicate it but we can contain it and almost eradicate it at river crossings,” she said. “We’ve been able to inhibit new growth.”

Seeking a solution

Even with all the volunteers in the world pulling up white sweet clover plants along the Dalton Highway, it would be practically impossible to stop the spread of the invasive weed, said Seefeldt, the researcher from the USDA.

“Eradication is a pipe dream” without using herbicides, Seefeldt said.

Part of the problem with pulling mature plants is that it disturbs the ground and distributes more seeds to grow. Seeds can live for up to 80 years in the ground before sprouting.

“Making sure there isn’t mature seed on the plant is critical,” said Seefeldt. “If you pull up one plant and 50 seeds sprinkle out, are you winning that battle?”

Researchers at the USDA have been experimenting with herbicides to see what works against white sweet clover and what impacts it might have on other plants and animals.

“There are some herbicides that we found that provide excellent control at very low rates,” Seefeldt said.

One of them is chlorsulfuron, which is commonly called telar.

“It doesn’t move much in the soil,” he said. “It stays where you spray it and it stays active for a long time, so any new seedlings germinating are killed.”

However, it will kill some native plants, Seefeldt acknowledged.

Scientists are hoping to see if moose will eat white sweet clover this fall at the Kenai Moose Research Center and determine whether or not moose pass the seeds through their digestive systems, Seefeldt said.

Scientists also are studying whether white sweet clover will colonize burn areas, of which there are several along the Dalton Highway and in the Kanuti refuge. So far, there has been no evidence the weed is sprouting up in burned areas.

The BLM is in the process of conducting an environmental assessment of the impact white sweet clover is having and composing a management plan to deal with it and other invasive species.

“We don’t know enough yet to know exactly what we’re going to do,” said Gronquist, who is on the Alaska Committee for Noxious and Invasive Plants Management.

But both Spindler and Gronquist said something will eventually have to be done to stop the spread of white sweet clover and other invasive species.

“I think eventually the public will understand we have to use herbicides,” Spindler said. “The question I have is how can we use them safely near water?

“If we can hold them at bay until we get the necessary research done, maybe we have a chance,” he said.

Community Discussion

Newsminer.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full user's agreement.

  1. FreeDarfur
    7/26/2008, 8:13 a.m.
    Suggest removal

    Thank you DOT for introducing invasive plants when you sprayed the road sides and highways after construction with them to have a fast growing coverage. Don't forget vetch, that bluish plant seen growing along the road sides. Surprised the article didn't mention how these plants came to be along the Dalton. Just take a look around the Borough road system, white sweet clover and bird vetch is everywhere.

  2. sniffles
    7/26/2008, 8:51 a.m.
    Suggest removal

    Please DOT/BLM and the others that MUST find something to do to spend ANY money at all---- The weeds are here--do something helpful to the community/world!
    Go to Darfur, volunteer in a soup kitchen,go teach people how to grow their own food. Teach a trade to a teenager---- Pulling weeds was what we did on the farms in the hay fields as kids. I certainly don't see a hay field on the Dalton! Help the world -- Not the road!
    (boy did that sound like my mother?) Thanks MOM!

  3. sniffles
    7/26/2008, 8:55 a.m.
    Suggest removal

    Freedarfur-- Paragraph 16--"1913 as a potential forage crop" .Must be something redeeming about it.

  4. FreeDarfur
    7/26/2008, 9:07 a.m.
    Suggest removal

    Sniffles forms of vetch is also known as loco weed in the western states. May explain why all those red squirrels like to play let's race across the road with cars, or is it the mushrooms. You know the simple answer to this , just take it off the invasive plant list and name it a new Alaskan plant, ends the problem.

  5. alaskastoryteller
    7/26/2008, 9:30 a.m.
    Suggest removal

    Our cattle used to eat off the sweet clover and it made for the best tasting beef. Instead of getting rid of it maybe we could feed it to our livestock.

  6. Archer
    7/26/2008, 10:28 a.m.
    Suggest removal

    I wish they would do better with using scientific names in these articles.

    White sweet clover that they are referring to is, I believe, melilotus alba.

    The white clover that we remember from youth (looking for four leafed clovers and sucking nectar from the flowers), that is used in lawns and as forage is trifolium repens. Apparently this is also quite edible.

    They are both from the same family, but are not the same plant.

    It might be wise to see if moose do eat these plants. I understand that this species, the melilotus, is invasive. However, do we know if the species might not actually provide MORE benefit to this area of the world instead of less? Just because it is not "native", that does not mean it is bad. It might be, for example, that a plant will provide better nutrition for moose or caribou. Might be that the plant will provide the opportunity for another native plant to become more dominant. Change is not necessarily good or bad. It can be either. The world was not perfect or unchanging before humans were here.

    If we can eradicat invasive species via pulling or encouraging local flora, that is fine I suppose. However, I would also maintain that we need to see if there are uses for these plants. It would seem to be useful to encourage people to see what they can forage locally to cut their food costs and increase nutrition.

    Is it wise to poison both plant and animal in order to eradicate a species? NO!

    Instead of using poisons to eradicate a natural (though not native) species of flower, which will seep into our ground water, and that of the animals and plants, how about looking at it like "This is what it is, let's see what we can do to work WITH what is growing, not against it.". For example, dandelions were brought over to the US on purpose. Many consider them pests, but might change their minds if they understood the many different HUMAN uses of dandelions for food and medicine.

    Even if humans were not here, plants and animals would be spread by animal and wind, be aggressive, die out, be overtaken, etc. Species go extinct, species emerge. Life on earth is more like clouds, always changing and shifting, instead of like a painting, static and still.

  7. ProtectAK
    7/28/2008, 4:40 p.m.
    Suggest removal

    White sweetclover (yes melilotus alba) is a noxious, invasive weed. Not the short little white clover or the clover with the purple bloom...this is the very tall, spindly, spiky plant with white flowers. When these scientists refer to invasives, they are talking about weeds that have the ability to decimate the economy, ecology and environment of an area where they become entrenched. When introdcuded to the US they do not travel with the natural controls Mother Nature designed (insects, other plants, climate). For white sweetclover, it was hoped it would be an agricultural supplement. Unfortunately, the area planted soon becomes nothing BUT white sweetclover. And it, alone, does not have any substantial nutritive value to foraging animals. And it won't respect property lines, so it will spread and take over where it was never intended to be. And science has now shown that if the hay that contains white sweetclover is not properly cured, the white sweetclover produces dicoumarin (anti-coagulant) and entire herds can be sickened or even die.

    Link to an article from Purdue Veterinary School
    http://www.vet.purdue.edu/depts/addl/tox...

    A simple google search will provide much, much more information. There are studies underway to prove what many suspect--where white sweetclover take over, the moose leave. While fresh plants are not harmful to the moose, neither are they able to sustain them.

    Ask yourself if you would be happy with a lawn that is full of nothing but Canada Thistle and what that would do to your property value? Or if salmon no longer swam up a creek or river because it was choked by Canary Reed Grass? And think for a second about the long ranging impacts to every Alaskan if things like salmon, moose, fisheries, land values are destroyed? States in the lower 48 have budgets in the tens of millions because they DIDN'T act to prevent....now they are just trying to fend off total invasions

    I know herbicides are a touchy subject, but one must remember that we aren't talking about the DDT of old. To make a blanket statement that using herbicide means it will "seep into the ground water" is not based on scientific evidence. Many herbicides have been developed that are very specific in what they affect. Science has made leaps and bounds in this area. While I would certainly PREFER not to use any herbicides at all, the evidence is clear that allowing these invasives to "do what comes naturally' will completely change the face of Alaska. I would much rather make the choice to use a teaspoon now to prevent a noxious weed from getting a foothold than face having to use a gallon to save a salmon stream or a moose habitat.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Also inside
Today's news / Photos / Local / Alaska / Sports / Opinion
Features
Sundays / Health / Food / Outdoors / Latitude 65 / Youth / Business
newsminer.com
Archives / About / Feedback / Privacy Policy / User Agreement / Jobs / Contact / Feeds / Twitter / YouTube / Bookstore
Submit
Letters to the Editor / Applause / Events / Obituaries