Letter to the editor
Nov. 9, 2012
To the editor:
Daily declares daring ducks endangered by Dodges while undaunted by declining degrees and deficient diets. Do-gooders dare detainment for deliberate, divisive and disobedient distribution of delicacies, as drab Daisy’s and dandified drake’s dalliance is decidedly declared dangerous to downtown daily developments.
Is Dermot’s declaration denoting depopulation to be declared defensible? Do these daring denizens deserve death? Do doting diner’s diabolic decisions of deference to debatable dictates of the Duck Department decidedly deteriorate democratic decision? And are these distracted ducklings only drawn to this downtown department store by dreams of downy dependents now dead and determined as dressings for destitute dog drivers?
Determinate declaration from dignitaries is desirable, but may denote undoable destruction. Don’t delay. Detribalized and disdained, these delectable degenerates deserve due diligence not drudgery deplete of dignity. Damning, dilatory dilemma dooms our dimorphic dippers; indecisive digression only delays. Death to deluded despotism or redemption from diabolic daring. Democracy decide!