Former accounting supervisor accused of embezzling from Fairbanks court system
by Chris Freiberg / cfreiberg@newsminer.com
Aug 31, 2010 | 7572 views | 16 16 comments | 28 28 recommendations | email to a friend | print
FAIRBANKS — The former district accounting supervisor at the Fairbanks courthouse has been accused of embezzling $237,000 worth of bail money from the court system.

The office of special prosecutions on Monday filed one charge of first-degree theft against Katherine L. Turner, 39. The charge is a class B felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison.

Ron Woods, the area court administrator, contacted Alaska State Troopers July 9 after noticing irregularities in bail deposits, according to charging documents.

Many entries had been backdated to show money being received weeks or months after it should have been deposited, and all of the suspicious transactions had been made by Turner.

When questioned by troopers a week later, she reportedly admitted to using a “pyramid-type scheme” to embezzle money during the past three years, according to charging documents.

Turner was removed from her position as accounting supervisor in July, around the same time Woods sent a memo to courthouse employees about the investigation.

Turner allegedly took the bail money as it came in, only depositing it in the trust account a day or two before it was scheduled to be exonerated.

Though she is accused of taking $237,000 worth of bail money, most of the cash, $144,000 was belatedly deposited, and investigators say $93,000 is still unaccounted for, according to a criminal complaint filed in court.

A search of her car also turned up 89 missing court documents related to the missing money.

Turner, who has no prior criminal record, reportedly told troopers she used the money for “living expenses.”

She is scheduled to be arraigned on the charge this afternoon before Superior Court Judge Douglas Blankenship. Court records do not list a lawyer for her.

Contact staff writer Chris Freiberg at 459-7545.
Comments
(16)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
carlad
|
September 02, 2010
Freezee

Hilarious post.HAHAAHA
carlad
|
September 02, 2010
WHY use are real names...

when this is so muuuuuch more fun.

C'mon, I have more of a life now, and i'm getting a feel for the mindset of my neighbors.

And i'm finding out they are sensible,full of satire,thoughtful, bizarre, and give a damn about Alaska and the DNM.

Why post our names, when we have this type of interaction.We can all be talking souls, without our name labels on.

It sure would be eye opening to put faces to names,I do agree with that.But then we would not have this type of dialogue.

So the mystery will continue;for now anyway,who knows what may happen with privacy issues in the future.

Back to the subject at hand.

This lady chose to steal,lady got found out.

She made her choices.

Nothing wrong with siding with justice.

But something wrong when one sides with injustice.

Yes,people make mistakes.

But some mistakes are life changing.

We as adults get to choose how we live our lives.

And have to live with the consequences.

Such is life.

Pays to choose wisely, as many posters have wrote.

C'mon now, most of us that write on here are taking an active interest in our local news.And are concerned about the goings on where we live.

COWARDS - usually don't give a damn about anything but themselves.

88888
|
September 01, 2010
The entire clerk's office should have a thorough audit, including policies and procedures.

They use some very unconventional accounting practices. For example, when someone goes in to pay a judgment, they pay the balance due. Then the clerk adds uncharged interest, and the person has a balance due that they don't even know about. And that balance continues to be charged interest.

I knew a person whose bank account was garnished to pay for a judgment that had been paid years previously (including the interest). It was purely an error on the part of the court, and it took them 8 months to get the money back into the person's bank account. (And no interest was added, of course.)

They are also very sloppy about how they keep track of community service hours. And when community service hours are not completed by the time they are due (even if through an error of the court clerk), they "unsuspend" suspended fines and turn them in for collection - presumably without the judge having any input regarding the suspended fine.
Freezee
|
September 01, 2010
I can't use my real name. The masses would be too starstruck by my celebrity to even form coherent sentences.
AmyGould
|
September 01, 2010
Apparently there are loads of cowards in Fairbanks as well. Why can't you commentators use your real names? FDNM really should require it just as they do for Letters to the Editor. OWN YOUR WORDS PEOPLE. At least we'll know what IQ point goes with whom. And the targets will know their enemies. SO EASY to kick someone when they are down. Instead of wasting your time to bash and vent (how many of you are writing from your work desk??????? um...that's stealing too)...how about doing something nice for someone else, do charitable work, lend a hand, give a hand up to someone in need.
lalaleelou
|
September 01, 2010
seven51

I would think that the court system would take certified checks, cashier checks and possibly credit/debit cards. That would probably have helped in this situation.

It's inconceivable that this went on for three years before anyone got suspicious.
seven51
|
September 01, 2010
Not for sure how the Alaska court system works. But the way most court systems work, is cash for bail, return of bail money can only be paid with a check.
ILoveAlaska
|
September 01, 2010
Navin said:

"So what will they set bail at? Will they take a check?"

LMAO! That's hilarious!
41yrsinFbxandlovingIt
|
September 01, 2010
lalaleelou - Okay, I have to agree with you on that, I do have an admitted shoe problem. But there's no 12-step program for that. :)
lalaleelou
|
September 01, 2010
41years,

I have to disagree with you. It's cheap shoes that aren't worth the savings!
grace3
|
September 01, 2010
I think embezzlement is a special type of stealing which takes a special kind of coldness. It's not spontaneous, but very calculated. It's not the result of a drunken stupid mistake, but a clear-headed choice to take something that is not yours, and over which you have been given a position of trust.

It requires a person to do it against or around people they work with every day, which means every interaction is wrapped in phoniness. It means using a lot of time to keep all the stories straight, and in this case, to keep track of when money would need to be available to the person who posted it (did she have her own little spreadsheet and reminders system?)

It requires sustained deception 24-7 while otherwise doing normal work and personal activities.

She doesn't even use the substance abuse excuse.

I do, however, really wonder how this could go undetected for so long. Even though she was a supervisor, when someone handles a lot of money, shouldn't there be at least some kind of informal audit process going on?

If she gets probation without any jail time to serve, simply because she has not prior record, it will be completely wrong. Each separate act of taking and replacing money was a crime.
41yrsinFbxandlovingIt
|
September 01, 2010
Fat lot of good that embezzling is doing her now. Pretty hefty living expenses. Just goes to show the fanciest car, biggest house, nicest clothes and most expensive shoes are just not worth the price paid.

Ah well, FCC will provide you ugly gold or blue cotton pull on pants, scrub type top, faded gray undershirts, nasty stretched out tube socks, even nastier stretched out 50's era bra, granny panties and three questionable meals a day. Have fun Turner.
hrdharry
|
September 01, 2010
She wont have to worry about living expences wheres shes going.
Shokd
|
September 01, 2010
Be it our "representatives" in Juneau swimming in Big Oil "campaign contributions"...

Or the local yokel government accountant...

Nothing says Alaskan government like taking the money and running.
rogerx
|
September 01, 2010
Really makes you wonder what else is going on if someone can get away with taking $237,000 over three years ... and nobody noticed for three years!

... maybe it's just me.
Navin
|
September 01, 2010
So what will they set bail at? Will they take a check?
Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.