Democratic U.S. Sen. Mark Begich joined the chorus of support for McAdams, saying he and aides have already offered campaign advice.
“If he says he wants my help, I’ll do whatever’s necessary,” Begich said Tuesday.
Begich, speaking by phone from Anchorage, said he was impressed by McAdams’ intelligence and independence and said he hopes to help introduce him to a broader audience.
McAdams, the mayor of Sitka, is a 39-year-old former commercial fishing deckhand raised in Southeast. He easily took last week’s Democratic primary, earning almost 50 percent of the vote in a four-way race. His closest opponent took 19 percent.
Democratic Party leaders this week were quick to back McAdams, brushing aside suggestions they’d seek a more experienced and recognizable candidate when it became apparent that Miller could defeat incumbent Sen. Lisa Murkowski in the GOP primary.
“People don’t want our senator to represent an ideological wing or fringe, but the whole state,” Deborah Williams, executive director of the Alaska Democratic Party, said Monday. She said top Democrats had incorporated the prospect of a Miller primary victory into their campaign strategy and doubted that strategy would change.
McAdams reported raising only $9,000 — a puny sum for a national senatorial campaign — through June. But McAdams supporters said a Miller win would level the playing field by eliminating the incumbent and leaving two candidates seeking to make fresh impressions with many voters.
McAdams addressed the name-recognition issue on his website before the Miller victory was clear. Some might doubt he could beat “a well-known incumbent,” he acknowledged, but he expected a solid chance against Miller.
McAdams said he thinks he’s closer ideologically to Murkowski than Miller. He also sees himself as more likely to carry on the legacy of former Sen. Ted Stevens, who Begich defeated in 2008, partly by working across party lines.
“So while Joe continues to court national press, we’ll continue to court Alaska voters,” McAdams said by phone Tuesday.
McAdams lists “fiscal responsibility,” resource development and “individual liberty” among his top issues. He supports oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. His campaign website promises to fight any “outside interest, corporate or governmental” that threatens individual freedom, protecting “how we live, who we love, where we pray or what we think.”
Begich said McAdams told him he’d like to scrap No Child Left Behind, the 9-year-old federal education initiative, and create a national renewable energy fund with proceeds from oil and gas development.
Begich said he sent aides to help McAdams and expects donors and Democratic supporters will quickly grow to recognize the candidate, partly because many dislike former Gov. Sarah Palin, who endorsed Miller late this summer.
Begich said he viewed Miller’s campaign as negative, a “politicized national” campaign that included suggestions of privatizing Social Security. Begich said he’s come to appreciate Stevens’ recognition that the federal government could help Alaska mature.
“I don’t think (Miller) really understands that,” Begich said.
Contact staff writer Christopher Eshleman at 459-7582.



And why not? Haase can go back home to Oregon with his pockets full, and leave us Alaskans to clean up the subsequent mess.
Do the names Winton C. Arnold or Albert White ring bells with anyone? In the 1940s and 1950s, they manipulated the territory's elected officials behind the scenes, to the point where nothing could be accomplished.
This is not necessarily a bad thing, as people like Austin E. Lathrop and Walter J. Hickel became filthy rich and made substantial contributions to our way of life in the process. In this day and age, they would have been taxed to death first, or even shut out of any opportunities in the first place.
Anyway, I'm starting to see the parallels with Halcro. Hopefully, everyone knows that his daddy was the money man for the Republicans in Alaska for years. At least he has the pedigree for it.
Location: Fairbanks
Case number: 10-81530
Type: Motor Vehicle Collision-Damage
Text: On 8/27/2010 at 0735 hours, Alaska State Troopers responded to a
three car motor vehicle collision on Geist near Wilcox. Mark Alan Lewis,
age 49 of Fairbanks, was rear ended by James Gregory Raisis, age 58 of
Denali Park as he was stopped in the middle turn lane to turn left into
Hutchinson high school. Prior to Raisis rear-ending Lewis, Raisis was
rear ended by Joseph Wayne Miller, age 43 of Fairbanks. All drivers
utilized their seatbelts and no one injured. All three vehicles
sustained heavy damage. After an investigation of the three vehicle
collision, Mark A. Lewis issued a citation for Stopping on a Highway and
Joseph W. Miller was issued a citation for Driver to Exercise Due Care
to Avoid a Collision.
http://www.adn.com/2010/09/01/1434932/rasmussen-poll-miller-has-6-point.html
http://www.scottmcadams.org/
Oh yes we are. We are a republic of federated states. You must be a product of public schools post Jimmy Carter.
I heard your wife was &utt ugly,and so fat you had to widen the door to your trailer so she could get thru.Good thing she isn't running.
Not so much fun is it?
Joe Miller is a really nice guy. He really is. But he's not up to it. Begich has been trying to steal Lisa's ideas for two years. Miller is just plain scary.
Want a real Senator who represents the mainstream of Alaska and can think independently? Draft Lisa into a write in campaign!
Sure, its all a matter of perspective. Everyone looks liberal when the accuser is so far right they are falling off the page.
I meant to say "sending Imams around the world as envoys to Muslim nations."
Those sound like excellent qualities in a used car salesman.
**
What does Scott McAdams believe about government spending? Does he go along with Obamacare, with monthly stimulus legislation, with the feds instituting regulations and taxes that are keeping investors on the sidelines, with "Keep Out" signs around vast federal land holdings in all of the western states, particularly Alaska? Will he support Cap and Trade? Will he support Card Check? How does he feel about the ratio of national debt to national income and how does he think that the federal government should keep debt burden manageable? Does McAdams believe in the separation of church and state, and if so how does that reconcile that with the federal government financially and politically supporting Islam (building mosques around the world and sending State Dept. envoys)? How about border security? Is McAdams with the Obama administration in being hesitant in enforcing border protection, antagonistic toward the sovereign state of Arizona, and for amnesty for illegal immigrants? Would he be all for dismantling missile defense and relying on the good intentions of our enemies and on the diplomatic skills of the administration?
I'm willing to listen, but the BS being written here is certainly not enlightening. "He's a good guy. He's a man of the people. He's big hearted. He's one of us", or, on the other hand about Miller, "He can't drive. His face is harry. He moved up here from Kansas."
It's all meaningless. Tell me where McAdams stands on the issues.
Undeniably, Miller is being forthright in his positions. You can tell by all the squealing from the left. I just watched him on Fox, and he wasn't hem hawing about his position on states' rights.
Step up to the plate, Mayor McAdams.
If you liberals stick to the issues it might be close for McAdams. But more than likely you will not be able to control yourselves and this is going to be a blowout.
The Lower 48 libs are going to give a lot of money to McAdams. And I do hope bOybama and begich stump for him.
McAdams is the real Alaska deal. Big, good natured, feisty, shakes your hand like a man (not whiney like Joe) - not at all a liberal, just a small town mayor with a job to do. He is waiting to sink his teeth into Miller.
This is going to be fun to watch!
I agree with oldowl and invictus. (wow...) A debate between McAdams and Miller would be great. I am not closed to either one, and would like to hear where they both stand, and what vision they both have. Also, a great key is how they react during the debate.
Patricelee, the preamble says "in ORDER TO FORM a more perfect union...do ordain and establish this constitution...". Promoting the general welfare was one of their concerns, yes, but not to the extent that the federal government could over-extend their powers. Also, one part of the constitution (remember, no picking/choosing...) says that powers not explicitly given to the federal government resides with the states and the people. Personally, I like the parks. I don't object to them. I am just stating what the constitution says.
I'm hoping he gets elected.