A researcher with the state Section of Epidemiology combed over five years of records at the Fairbanks Memorial Hospital. She found that for every 10 micrograms per cubic meter increase of a harmful pollutant known as PM2.5:
• a 7 percent increased risk that someone under age 65 will visit the hospital because of stroke symptoms,
• a 6 percent increased risk for people over age 65,
• a 6 percent increased risk that someone under 65 will visit the hospital for a respiratory illness.
The examination of hospital visits is the first study looking at air quality health impacts in Fairbanks.
Other studies show that wood smoke is a major contributor to PM2.5.
“Basically, this study reaffirms what has already been demonstrated in similar studies performed outside of Alaska,” the study’s author, epidemiologist Rachel Kossover, said in a written statement. “People with heart and lung problems need to take air quality warnings seriously and follow the advice of local officials.”
Kossover said she did not look at a possible correlation between visits to doctors offices and days of poor air quality.
“It would be much more time consuming and technically difficult,” she said.
The study backs controversial efforts by Fairbanks North Star Borough Mayor Luke Hopkins to improve air quality. A new set of borough regulations, approved by the assembly in May, target wood burning.
“I am not surprised by the results,” Hopkins said. “It’s unfortunate that people in our community are being affected by poor air quality. I hope that people understand that burning any home heating device that we want to keep our homes warm, it’s important, but we also need to be sure that people are aware of the results we continue to get with poor air quality.
“We have more health effects to our residents.”
Hopkins made reference to a ballot measure that, if approved, would appear to roll back the regulations on wood burning and the types of stoves that can be installed in the borough. Those found in violation of the new regulations are subject to fines starting at $30.
Voters on Oct. 5 will be asked to vote yes or no on the following statement: "The borough shall not ban, prohibit, or fine residents for the use of home heating devices."
A group called the North Star Landowners is backing the ballot measure. The group includes Rep. Tammie Wilson, R-North Pole.
Wilson legislative aide Rick VanderKolk, speaking on behalf of the ballot measure group, said the group acknowledges air quality is a problem. Its members don’t agree with the borough’s solution.
“We contend the borough is not capable of adequately addressing the problem through subjective code enforcement,” VanderKolk said. “We also maintain the more important correlation is the relationship between air quality and the cost of energy. As biomass technologies begin to thrive, such as the new wood pellet plant, air quality and the cost of energy will be addressed. Government regulation will solve neither.”
Some local leaders think approval of the ballot measure effectively would turn over air quality enforcement to the state. VanderKolk has said the ballot measure group supports a state-administered air quality program despite a voter desire, as indicated in passage of an advisory measure last year, to keep administration local.
The health study examined 5,718 visits to Fairbanks Memorial Hospital, including 1,596 emergency room visits, for conditions related to heart disease, stroke and respiratory illnesses from September 2003 to December 2008. The emergency room visits studied were for the year 2008.
The researcher looked at the age of the patient and the primary diagnosis, correlating the information with hourly PM2.5 data collected from the borough Air Quality Program.
The researcher did not look for an association between deaths and PM2.5 concentrations. The Fairbanks population is too small to come up with meaningful conclusions, a Department of Health and Social Services fact sheet about the study stated.
Contact staff writer Amanda Bohman at 459-7544.


The Effect of Particulate Air Pollution on Emergency Admissions for Myocardial Infarction: A Multicity Case-Crossover Analysis
Antonella Zanobetti and Joel Schwartz
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard
"Abstract
Recently, attention has focused on whether particulate air pollution is a specific trigger of myocardial infarction (MI). The results of several studies of single locations assessing the effects of ambient particular matter on the risk of MI have been disparate. We used a multicity case-crossover study to examine risk of emergency hospitalization associated with fine particulate matter (PM) with aerodynamic diameter < 10 μm (PM10) for > 300,000 MIs during 1985–1999 among elderly residents of 21 U.S. cities. We used time-stratified controls matched on day of the week or on temperature to detect possible residual confounding by weather. Overall, we found a 0.65% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.3–1.0%] increased risk of hospitalization for MI per 10 μg/m3 increase in ambient PM10 concentration. Matching on apparent temperature yielded a 0.64% increase in risk (95% CI, 0.1–1.2%)"
"...We conclude that increased concentrations of ambient PM10 are associated with increased risk of MI among the elderly."
"Daily monitoring of PM10 is not done in all U.S. cities. We selected the following 21 cities with daily monitoring of PM and representing a geographic distribution across the country: Birmingham, Alabama; Boulder, Colorado; Canton, Ohio; Chicago, Illinois; Cincinnati, Ohio; Cleveland, Ohio; Colorado Springs, Colorado; Columbus, Ohio; Denver, Colorado; Detroit, Michigan; Honolulu, Hawaii; Houston, Texas; Minneapolis–St. Paul, Minnesota; Nashville, Tennessee; New Haven, Connecticut; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Provo-Orem, Utah; Salt Lake City, Utah; Seattle, Washington; Steubenville, Ohio; and Youngstown, Ohio."
Actually, I didn't like the IM tests because they tested the new vehicles (the ones with better emission standards) and exempted the old ones (they tended to be the worst offenders). Now, if the IM program required vehicles over 10 (or something along those lines) years old to be tested, I might be more agreeing of it.
Personally, I think we should go after those who burn the evil stuff as public nuisances. Just my two moose nuggets. (phrase stolen from someone, but can't remember whom, sorry...)
I hate to burst your ignorance-bubble, but LA has cleaned up it's air considerably in the last three decades through regulation. Sorry to be the bearer of such regulatory news. :-)
And hey, "Storm troopers"?! LOL
Summer fires don't discount the fact that we have a problem with filthy air that's detrimental to the people living here. We can't stop fires from happening, but we make it illegal to burn green wood, which appears to be at the root of the air problem. The boilers are not meant to burn green wood any more than a fireplace is meant to burn tires. Both create harmful air, and neither should be allowed. Nobody has the right to make public air dangerous to breathe, and if green wood is the culprit, then it should be banned, not the stoves that weren't meant to burn it in the first place. The problem is the FUEL, not the stoves, RIGHT? So ban burning green wood! Hell, we could have a community wood pile where people could turn in green wood for seasoned wood for a nominal fee that could help pay for the system. But that would mean paying for a solution, and God knows we're not going to do that! So what if it would solve the green wood problem?!
- All tobacco has been eliminated from stores!
- All forest fires are immediately snuffed out!
- We have a complete recycle program that would eliminate the need to use the burning barrel!
- When all retail parking lots have electric plug-ins available to plug your vehicle in, rather than let it run while you shop!
- All vehicles run on propane or natural gas!
_ etc, etc, etc!!!!!
Maybe we could do a self assessment! Take one piece of paper, on one side write the reasons you live here. On the other side, write the reasons that you should leave. If the reasons you live here is the longest list, quit griping and get on with life. If the reasons you should leave is the longest list, then you probably should!
There is no perfect world or even perfect city. Maybe you would like LA and all their smog! We do need to take care of our environment. That should be a huge priority, but things don't change over night, after decades of habit. Storm troopers checking to see if your papers are in order and how dense the smoke from your stove that heats your home, do nothing but aggravate an already frustrated population.
http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/28/real_estate/most_polluted_cities/index.htm
It's always about money, ain't it? People didn't like the I.M. tests, because they cost money (especially if you drive a piece of crap, now the ignorant are free to drive whatever carbon puking jalopy they want).
I love all the six-pack science and old wives tales some folks are trying to pass as "valid science" in the comments down below. I suppose there will always be a useless, unappreciative "anti-scientific" cross section of society, as there always has been. Dead weight being dragged, kicking and screaming into the future.
Google EPA indoor air pollution
Also, go over to Low's or Home Depot and read the graphs and information on the filter packages.
Look for a product made by "3M" "Filtrete Filters"
---
Wal-Mart, Sears sells HEPA rated indoor filters made by Honeywell. They are in the 100 dollar price rage, have a washable pre filter with an ionizer.
Arctic Safety has P100 face masks which will remove smoke particles. $8 range.
---
A simple filter made from "head liner" fabric purchased from Jo-Ann's or a bath towel placed behind a "box" fan set on low speed will also work.
Also, one of the Filtrete Filters will work .. choose a 2,000 rated filter. Tape in place with duck tape.
---
Do not set the box fan on the high speed, it will cause the motor to over heat! And, it does not work any better.
You can spray a VERY small amount of Pam cooking oil on the suction side of the bath bath towel to help catch more dust.
To much spray will clog the filter.
You will be surprised how much dust you will catch.
None of the above is expensive or requires any government jobs, studies, or action.
__ _ ____ __________ __
/ /| | / / |/ / ____/ |/ /
/ / | | / / /|_/ / / __ | /
/ /__| |/ / / / / /_/ // |
/_____/___/_/ /_/\____//_/|_|
Say no more. Government studies conveniently always support the government position.
DUH.
I've been hoarse and choking for two years with all the smoke that's been in the air from the fires, and so have half the people I know.
Why can't fires close to town be put out?
Mayor Hopkins, "You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?"
Oh for the love of,...will this Gore wanna-be ever stop his parental nanny state father knows best grand standing pom-pass drivel B.C.?
He spews enough hot air to heat all our homes, if Tammie were our mayor now we would be cleaning house of deadwood, yeah that would be good for the environment alright. This little technocrat nerd wants to create with your tax dollars an Borough investigation and enforcement unit. What is he thinking about? I thought we should be reducing our Borough's budget, what ever he thinks we may loose from the Fed tit for not meeting some PPM quota is nothing compared to the bucks he will blow with this ridiculous regulatory scheme, his enforcement will be fighting suits and counter suits, which will mean more of your tax bucks to fight their own Borough residents, hasn't anyone thought this through? No they are just so excited about micromanagement for the thrill it gives them that frankly they don't give a dam because daddy Hopkins knows, you listen children and be quite.