Assembly member Matt Want responded as follows to my criticism of his proposed 5 percent across-the-board budget cut. I said the borough assembly was correct to reject his approach and that it was a pass-the-buck effort.
I would like to take this opportunity to explain (or defend due to
Mr. Cole’s interpretation) my position and reasoning for the across
the board 5% budget reduction.
Mr. Cole has the idea that I was vague in my budget cut to ‘pass the
buck’ to the Administration or Department Heads. This is not the
case. I testified that I did not want to turn the budget session into
a witch-hunt. I felt that it was improper to single out departments
and prioritize their importance in the community by limiting their
abilities through financial reductions. By reducing each department
by 5% this would effectively hold them to the current year budget.
Mr. Cole makes the claim that I have treated ‘every spending
category … as being of equal importance’. This claim is plainly
false. I have only treated the bottom line of each department of
equal importance, not each spending category within each department.
At no time did I suggest that each line of the budget be cut by 5%,
only the bottom line of each department.
Each year the Department Heads put together a proposed budget with
the Mayor. Together they create the approximately 5000 lines in the
budget. They decide where to allocate the requested resources.
Department Heads, such as Mr. Hernandez, Mr. Costello, and C.F.O. Mr.
Lamb, are all experts in their respective fields. It would be naïve
to assume that anyone outside of their fields could tell them how to
run their departments. The Assembly is not elected to micro-manage
departments. Reducing each department by 5% is only a request to
prioritize their budget. For one department, they may be able to meet
that by changing their travel expense, professional memberships,
others by reducing overtime. The point is that the Assembly is not
elected to make such micro-management decisions.
The Borough Assembly Handbook speaks nothing of line by line budget
managing in the responsibilities of an Assembly member. This duty is
however covered in the job descriptions of the Department Heads, and
Mayor. The Assembly is the legislative branch of the Borough. Perhaps
Mr. Cole is suggesting we should legislate through line item
budgeting? At the very least, this line item suggestion by Mr. Cole,
arguably, reflects little confidence in the abilities of the
Department Heads.
The FNSB is mandated by the state, and voters, to provide the
services that it does. Although the Borough may not be able to
perform the services that it does to their current levels with a 5%
reduction in funding, they should still be able to provide each of
the mandated services. We, as a community, have come to enjoy the
‘quality of life’ provided through Borough services and
recreation. Unfortunately, we are going through a period of economic
downturn in the private sector. Paying for this ‘quality of life’
is becoming more difficult for the private sector with stagnant
salaries, increased foreclosures and bankruptcies (references
according to the Fairbanks Economic Research Quarterly). In the
coming years it is easily foreseeable that our community will
experience diminished state and federal contributions. It will be
easier to make small trims now than deep cuts later. It would be
similar to constant healthy eating, versus crash dieting, or more
extreme, liposuction.
Finally, Mr. Cole puts into quotations- “Cut whatever you want and
take the blame”. I never made this statement. Nor did I make this
suggestion. What I will say though is that the Administration is
allowing itself wiggle room if the financial finger of blame starts
looking for a direction to point. The Mayor has proposed this budget.
If we, the Assembly, pass it as is, the Administration has the
ability to deflect angst from the community to the Assembly for
accepting it. If we line item edit this budget, again, the Mayor can
deflect angst from the departments to the Assembly for reducing it.
The Assembly represents the voters. Our job is to determine the level
of funding the Borough gets to provide these mandated services. The
departments and Mayor decide where to allocate this funding. The
Borough guide outlining the Assembly’s duties defines this.
I appreciate Mr. Cole’s interpretation of the budgeting events, and
alleging my desire to pass the buck. Unfortunately, his position on
the matter is wrong.
Just to put things in perspective, I *think* the Anchorage CPI (inflation) was also 2.5% for 2009. So it appears the Borough budget was increased by the maxiumum allowed by the tax cap.
I was also told the other day (so as of right now this is still rumor) that the Army has started moving the second Stryker Brigade onto Ft. Wainwright. When they're all moved in and settled, that will be an increase in the Borough population of roughly 10k. So in other words the Borough population is increasing, as we speak, by over 10% this year. That's going to put quite an additional demand on all area-wide services. And you thought the area roads were clogged at rush hour now. Ha! Traffic is about to get much worse.
And here's one more rumor for you, and this one kicks me (and probably most of you) in the gut. Apparently those "in-the-know" are expecting the price of fuel oil to double this winter. Yep, that would be $5.00 /gal fuel oil. I seriously hope that's just a nasty rumor and doesn't become our reality.
I'm no fan of run-away Government spending, but I'm not sure I'd equate a 2.5% increase in the budget to run-away Government spending given a 10 % increase in the Borough population.
Is Mr. Wants 5% decrease from last years budget reasonable? I dunno, it could be. I'm not as informed on the Borough budget as I'd like to be. But it also appears to me that there are going to be some extenuating circumstances that justify a 2.5% increase. In either case, I'm glad there are people on both sides of the debate paying close attention.
The FNSB School District. I thought my taxes took care of that, even tho' I don't have kids. WTH.
Mr. Want has written, and explained why, in term that most of you probably understand.
You may not agree with anything he does, but at least Dermot asks the questions and usually gets the answers. Which is way more than most of you posters can say, since your only good at criticizing!!!
5% seems like a good place to start seeing as the borough budget has exploded in size over the last decade.
I'd like to see ALL of the social services BS slashed entirely. The borough has no business getting involved in many of the things they have gotten their sticky little fingers in...