UAF scientists to study king salmon declines
by Staff Report
May 06, 2010 | 2407 views | 13 13 comments | 15 15 recommendations | email to a friend | print
FAIRBANKS — Scientists at the University of Alaska Fairbanks will get more than half a million dollars during the next two years to study the declines of western Alaska king salmon run.

The study will be funded with a $435,000 grant from the Pollock Conservation Cooperative Research Center and $180,000 in matching funds from the Alaska Sustainable Salmon Fund, according to a press release.

UAF professor Milo Adkinson and assistant professors Larissa Dehn and Megan McPhee will lead the project, which includes a consortium of UAF fisheries faculty from both Fairbanks and Juneau.

The project will focus on the health and ecology of freshwater king salmon runs and how those factors affect annual returns.

“Through this funding, the PCC hopes to contribute to a better understanding of the causes of king salmon problems in the Yukon and Kuskokwim River systems,” said Jan Jacobs of American Seafoods, who serves as co-chairman of the PCCRC Advisory Board.

The Pollock Conservation Cooperative Research Center is part of the UAF School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences and is funded by the Pollock Conservation Cooperative, a group of Bering Sea pollock catcher/processor companies.

Many western Alaska river fishermen have blamed poor king salmon runs on the incidental catch by Bering Sea pollock companies. Federal fisheries managers, in their most recent summary of the issue, confirmed that reducing bycatch could help but also said “there are many factors potentially contributing to the reductions in historic run strength.”

The pollock fleet’s king bycatch grew during the early years of the past decade to a high of about 122,000 in 2007 but dropped to 20,500 in 2008 and 12,400 in 2009. Total king catch by commercial, sport and subsistence fishermen in the Yukon, Kuskokwim and Bristol Bay river drainages averaged about 278,000 from 2003-2007.

The North Pacific Fishery Management Council, the federal board that sets pollock-fishing rules, voted in April 2009 to cap the allowable king bycatch in the Bering Sea at a maximum of 60,000 and create regulatory incentives to reduce king bycatch further. Public comments on the proposed rules resulting from the council’s amendment are due to the National Marine Fisheries Service today.

“The fishing industry is greatly concerned about recent declines in western Alaska salmon abundance,” Denis Wiesenburg, dean of the UAF School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences and director of the research center, said. “As a result, the PCCRC decided to direct significant funding this year to meaningful, focused research into the causes of these declines.”

The UAF researchers will examine how king salmon grow in freshwater and how growth affects survival to the age of reproduction. Another component will study how infection from the parasite ichthyophonus affects the health of freshwater-run king salmon. Ichthyophonus attacks the organs of the fish and causes reduced endurance and ability to spawn.

The PCC Research Center awards grants to UA faculty members and other scientists to study North Pacific marine and coastal ecosystems, fisheries and marine mammals. This year, the center requested that proposals for grants address issues of salmon health, ecology and migration.

The PCC has donated more than $10 million to UAF during the past

10 years. PCC companies include American Seafoods Co., Arctic Storm, Glacier Fish Co., Starbound and Trident Seafoods Corp.
Comments
(13)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
everything
|
September 06, 2010
I'm sure that after this expenditure the great King Salmon fish will never taste the same. Still, I'd like to hear about it. http://www.uafnews.com/

Oh_My_oh_my
|
May 07, 2010
Half a million????

Commonsense is free....

Lower the quanity of commercial licenses for alaskans.

Reduce numbers of the foreign commercial & lower 49 states fish intake.

Reduce the foreign commercial & lower 49 states catch load & days.

No new commercial licenses & permits for 5-7 years.

Then enforce the laws.

Give maximum fines.

We have to train our fisheries & ship owners & people who fish that tomorrow matters to Alaska.

I expect my state & resources to be protected today for tomorrow.

Rushing in or dragging feet or turning a blind eye hurts alaska & alaskans.

Simple commonsense.

A penny saved is a penny earned.

A fish saved is a fish earned.

1AhHa
|
May 07, 2010
I know it snowed yesterday!

They are blaming something besides global warming for fish decline!

--

Nice day..

---xsfym
Pearl=W
|
May 07, 2010
I'd agree with that, mileder. I think with the gov't [both State and Fed], it's the enforcement that's the problem, and the regs.

I wouldn't put much weight at all on the 'science' coming out of [large] commercial interests. Even if they don't pressure or buy researchers, they still can and do limit what is researched. By directing what is investigated, and what is not, it's possible to really 'color the picture' one way or the other.
mileder
|
May 07, 2010
Well, it's obvious, isn't it? No matter what conclusion is reached by the study it will have a negative effect on somebody's money-making fish operation. They will put up a fight, of course, and muddy the water with their own 'studies.' One thing is for absolute sure: the commercial guys don't give a red rat's about subsistence and non-guided sport fishermen. If anybody's on their side it's - believe it or not - some State or fed funded biologist not a gill netter out of Seattle.
Pearl=W
|
May 07, 2010
On Apr. 9th this year, Anch.paper [ADN] ran a story [not picked up by DNM]: "Top U.S. fisheries cop replaced after paper shred"

Dale Jones was removed as the head of NOAA's law enforcement office after a federal review detailed mismanagement in his agency, and found that he had ordered dozens of files distroyed during the investigation. . . .

This particular investigation and dust-up apparently primarily involved the policing of the NE fisheries. But as it involves the very top [national] enforcement level of NOAA's fishery regulations and policies, it does reflect on the possibility of more extensive [in areas/regions besides the NE Atlantic] corrupt practices
pheenyjo@hotmail.com
|
May 07, 2010
It would be interesting to know why the fish industry is such a mess since we have had a zillion past studies completed~~seems that tells us studies are not much help. By the time they are completed they are "history". With so many undetermined elements involving fish, oil, industry, pollution etc. studies are a guessing game and the money could be used for productive improvements of obvious problems in the ocean.
Wingmaster
|
May 07, 2010
I can't even finish reading this BS article. What the hell is a western alaska yukon king salmon? If its a Yukon King it came from a few rivers, the majority come out of Canada, the Tanana River and like two other major tributaries. All of which aren't in western alaska. Unless your talking Kusko river (there are only a few other smaller runs around) then theres no such thing.

Too many downriver commercial fisherman are crying that there is no fish to sell so there must be a problem. The heck with them I just want enough to eat for Alaskan families. The Yukon River can't feed the whole world.
out_in_the_cold
|
May 07, 2010
Good science .. or bought and paid for babble?

The life cycle of Yukon River king salmon from the egg stage to spawning adult .. with the BIG BLACK BOX of ignorance in the ocean environment.

One old study of survival of the eggs in fresh water, very limited fresh water early life history, no study of out-migration, no study of near shore ocean rearing, no study of predation in fresh water or salt water, limited studies of ocean migration from the Chukchi Sea to the Gulf of Alaska, available food, less than accurate return run strength and limited knowledge of where the fish spawn.

ADF&G, USFWS and NMFS agencies all having management authority and no desire to put down the coffee cup and get into the field to find out the facts for the Alaska BOF and NPFMC.

And worse yet, is the stingy politicians, both State and Federal, that have been unwilling to use PUBLIC funds for the fishery research.

UAF School of Fisheries and Ocean Science .. are you just getting started investigating Yukon River king salmon .. or is the building just another 'white whale' on the hill?

It is about time sport, personal use, subsistence and in-river commercial fishers start putting all of the above on the 'hot seat' .. before the pollack fishery 'king killers' are setting in Seattle on their parked boats wondering 'what happened to all that babble they paid for'?
ryemil
|
May 07, 2010
The Pollock fisheries bycatch in the past will have an affect on the future returns. It will take about 4-6 lifecycles to rebuild the stock. Since the kings return as 5 & 6 years old, that means it will take 20-30 years minimium & 24-36 years max. We're looking at a long period of recovery, but in the meantime, the pollock fisheries will continue. It will end up taking more like 40-60 years for recovery!(as long as pollock fisheries continue) They may not recover! The 2008-2009 pollock bycatch numbers can't be true, if they are the bycatch from the past has already begain it's devastation on the returns! Hopefully the bycatch numbers are false for 2008 & 2009!(which I think they are)
sepp
|
May 07, 2010
I was talking with a commercial fisherman a month ago about this issue. His take on it is the big Seattle based pollack fish processors and the corrupt federal officials aboard their processing vessels were to blame. Apparently, there is at least one video of a federal official accepting a $30k bribe from a captain to look the other way when their bycatch quota was reached. He believes this is a widespread problem.
just-saying
|
May 07, 2010
Interesting. So, generally, how do pollock and salmon get along?

.

Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.