Juneau representative questions director's job move to Anchorage
by The Associated Press
Mar 16, 2010 | 891 views | 6 6 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
JUNEAU, Alaska - A member of the statehouse's Juneau delegation is questioning the relocation of the director of the Division of Wildlife Conservation from the state capital to Anchorage.

House Minority Leader Beth Kerttula, D-Juneau, is not happy with the position's move from Juneau to Anchorage, which took place when Corey Rossi was made the new division director, effective Tuesday. Rossi, formerly the assistant commissioner of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, lives in Wasilla.

"Wildlife (Conservation) Division deals with a lot of controversy and has a lot of issues before the Legislature; this position needs to be in Juneau," she said.

Sen. Dennis Egan, D-Juneau, said moving the position to Anchorage was a "bad idea" and that he was unable to determine why it had been done.

Rossi replaces Division Director Doug Larsen, who is returning to his old job as southeast regional manager, fish and game department commissioner Denby Lloyd announced last week.

Lloyd defended the move by saying that the position was based in Anchorage prior to 1991.

Gov. Sean Parnell declined to comment on the decision to move the director's position to Anchorage. Spokeswoman Sharon Leighow also declined to say why the position had been moved and referred questions to Lloyd.

"The commissioners decide where to locate staff," she said.

Relocations must be approved by the Governor's Office of Management and Budget. Lloyd's written request to move the Wildlife Conservation Division director's duty station to Anchorage suggested it was at Rossi's insistence.

"He has accepted the position and requested to perform the duties from Anchorage," wrote Lloyd's administrative services director to the OMB.

"If the location changes are denied, the division will be unable to fulfill the staffing appointment," the Fish and Game memo said.

Kerttula said a desire by Rossi not to relocate was not a good enough reason.

"If it's because the guy lived in Wasilla, I don't accept that as a valid reason," she said.

Rossi is a relative newcomer to the agency. Lloyd said he chose Rossi because he brings a "can do" attitude to the agency's mission.

Rossi's selection has been criticized by some wildlife and conservation groups who believe his leadership will result in hunters being heavily favored over other user groups.

Comments
(6)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
oldowl
|
March 18, 2010
He reminds me of his friend Sarah Palin who thought she could choose where she worked also. He should be where his office is located or not get the job. There are definitely better people for the job. This state government gets more corrupt by the day.
Pearl=W
|
March 17, 2010
Charlie - I'm QUITE sure this man is not the only qualified person in the State of Alaska able to fill this post, unless perhaps the support of a particular political agenda [insider status?] is part of the necessary qualifications?

Since when do applicants for Ak's beauocractic positions get to dictate where the State can locate it's Offices?

crzys_grl
|
March 17, 2010
make him move to the interior and tend to wildlife from fairbanks or ohhh better yet HEALY!!!! that'll teach him to apply for random jobs he thinks pay well and he can just hang at home!!!
Charliebussell
|
March 16, 2010
The job requires an effective commissioner who works and is paid for by ALL Alaskan's...If that job can be better done from an office in Anchorage...that is what should be done..The vast majority of Alaskan's are not located in its pan-handle. I expect most of the commissions work is in Western and central Alaska and that is where the commissioner should be located. Seems to me the job done is far more important than where the office is located.
Txak
|
March 16, 2010
The job is in Juneau. If the guy doesn't want to live in Juneau, he shouldn't apply for the job. Go back to Wasilla, Rossi.
jlar555
|
March 16, 2010
No anthropomorphic pun intended, but this is a classic example of assigning the fox to guard the henhouse.

Joe LaRocca
Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.