Senate flag song addition conflicts with copyrighted text
by dermotcole
 Dermot Cole
Mar 10, 2010 | 1705 views | 27 27 comments | 15 15 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

 The state Senate voted 18-2 to add a second verse to "Alaska's Flag," with supporters saying they did so because the state song, based on the words of flag designer Benny Benson, does not recognize Alaska Natives.

The three Fairbanks senators, Joe Thomas, Joe Paskvan and John Coghill, voted in favor of the measure. Unfortunately, they, along with most of the Senate, have opted to treat the state song as a political document, instead of a work of art.

The measure, which was opposed by Sens. Con Bunde and Charlie Huggins,  now goes to the House.

Coghill said he supported adding a second verse for reasons of "harmony."

"As an official song, the idea of having a little harmony in it is a good thing because when we do have to deal with some of these tougher legal issues that are settling Alaska, this may very well be one good step forward," he said.

Missing from the Senate debate was any acknowledgment by proponents  that the copyrighted text, written by Juneau poet Carol Beery Davis, who stayed up late one night at age 95 to compose her addition,  is not what is contained in the bill.

Friends and family of Davis have said that approval of this bill would be an overdue honor for Davis, who was poet laureate of Alaska from 1967-69.

It appears that her friends and family, as well as our legislators, are willing to overlook or refuse to allow that there are shortcomings in the text.  Former Rep. Fran Ulmer introduced the original bill to add the extra verbiage in 1987, at Davis' request.

The text approved by the Senate Wednesday is not identical to that Davis donated to the University of Alaska Foundation, which holds the copyright.

This could present a legal dilemma because the foundation controls the use of "Alaska's Flag" and the added words from Davis. I have asked Sen. Linda Menard, the sponsor of the bill, is she knows how or why the text was changed, but have not received a response.

The copyrighted version submitted by Davis in 1986, is as follows, according to the UA Foundation: 

"A native lad chose our Dipper's stars

for Alaska's flag that there be  no bars

among our cultures. Be it known

through years our natives' past has grown

to share our treasures, hand in hand,

to keep Alaska our Great Land.

We love the northern midnight sky,

our mountains, lakes and the streams nearby,

Our Great North Star with its steady light

will guide our cultures clear and bright

with Nature's flag to Alaskans dear —

The simple flag of a Last Frontier."

There are nine changes, not counting capitalization and punctuation, between the copyrighted text and the second verse approved Wednesday. It's my guess that this was an attempt to improve a poem that wasn't deemed to be acceptable. The copyrighted text also has the title wrong. It says the title is "The Alaska Flag," but it really is "Alaska's Flag."

The revised language approved by the Senate is as follows:

"A Native lad chose the Dipper's stars

For Alaska's flag that there be no bars

Among our cultures. Be it known

Through years the Natives' past has grown

To share life's treasures, hand in hand,

To keep Alaska our Great Land;

We love the northern, midnight sky,

The mountains, lakes and streams nearby.

The great North Star with its steady light

Will guide all cultures, clear and bright,

With nature's flag to Alaskans dear,

The simple flag of the last frontier."



The flag song is a simple poem that is based on a short account written by Benny Benson, the Alaska Native student who designed the flag. It is a tribute to Benson in a real sense. In that text Benson did not say that he chose the Big Dipper stars for his design so "that there be no bars among our cultures."

What he actually said was this: "The blue field is for the Alaska sky and the forget-me-not, an Alaskan flower. The North Star is for the future state of Alaska, the most northerly in the union. The Dipper is for the Great Bear — symbolizing strength."

The state song does not need a second verse, no matter how well-intentioned the effort.

 

 

 

Comments
(27)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Zinkdifferent
|
March 12, 2010
Dermot: Why make a fuss about a trivial issue such as copyright rights? Society has already turned a blind eye to the trivial issue of the President's birth certificate. Those folks are called 'Birthers.' For journalists who fuss about copyright issues, I suggest a new category, 'copywriters.'
minor_epicycle
|
March 12, 2010
Alaskans are unique in the country: we actually know and spontaneously sing the (existing version) of our state song. No fawning political embellishments needed.

Agree with "fairbanksfoever" that 2nd verse is paternalistic rather than respectful to Alaska Natives and to several citing absurdity of "past has grown."

Look forward to "bump's" 3rd verse. Cannot be worse and surely more amusing!

ArcticWriter
|
March 12, 2010
Great. Way to ruin the sweetest and most beautiful state song of all of America.

The Alaska Flag song is about the state and its beauty, NOT about people and politics. The only mention of people in the song is the sourdough's dream, and that only briefly.

Shame on the State Senate for politicizing this song. This is right up there with flag burning legislation.

I have had the honor of being an anthem singer at sporting events and have always sung this song with joy, because of its simple beauty and its ability to portray our state. To make a political football out of this is a shame.

And yes I have Native members of my family and am active in supporting rights for all American Natives. But this is not the proper forum in which to do so.

Dermot is correct - leave our state song alone!
Yukonjohn
|
March 11, 2010
This is just a single symptom of the bigger problem. Other than Woodie Salmon, I am for getting rid of the whole lot of them. We need to hold a special election and vote them all out. They are a disgrace to our State, and a disgrace to themselves. Hell, the coke snorting, liquor drinking legislators of the 70s were head and shoulders above these clowns!! GET RID OF THEM NOW!! All except Woodie, one shining star amongst idiots!!!
Dove
|
March 11, 2010
Get over myself? There was a civilization here before the gold rush. A settlement? We're still paying? Good heavens, adding a 2nd verse to the Alaska song isn't about any settlement. Adding a 2nd verse is simple the right thing to do.

I'm not interested in arguing with you. If you can't grasp the importance of unity in a land we share with people, whose descendant's origins existed hundreds of years before the gold rush era, there's no educating the blind.
morym
|
March 11, 2010
I have seen it on these postings so many times...

There ain't no fixin' stupid!

Attach it to the freakin' gasline bill and move it the puck along.
lalaleelou
|
March 11, 2010
Dove,

Get over yourself, if you stop to think about it, the native population has received and continues to receive many, many benefits not offered to us "other" people. Apparently nobody understood the term "settlement" back in the 70's because we're still paying.

The only state song that warranted updating was that of Kentucky and now it's still rediculous; unless, of course, the entire population of Kentucky is gay.
lalaleelou
|
March 11, 2010
Well, Paskvan, Thomas and Coghill just lost any support I may have had for them. The Alaska Flag song was perfect as it was. The new verse is not only unnecessary, it's clumbsy.

Apparently in an effort to honor Benny Benson, they never considered the slap in the face to Marie Drake.

Here's an idea, get back to the real business of Alaska! It's no wonder they're having trouble getting their work done in the 90 days, which was also a very bad idea.
longhornak
|
March 11, 2010
Dove:

I personally don't have much of an issue with a second verse, or an Alaska state dog. (I must have missed that one...) My issue is with their prioritization. There will probably be a special session called for energy reasons. My question is: would a special session on the Alaska state song be worth it?

There are some things more important than others. Energy is more important than the state song or the state dog. Our politicians need to prioritize better.
doc_powmiariders
|
March 11, 2010
I am not sure why we want to change the words to the state song. DO our state representatives have nothing better to do? I do not care for the politically correct world we live in. Would you change the Declaration if Independence or the National Anthem just because it offends one person or culture. Too bad. Our country was founded on certain values. If you dont like them leave.
oldakcuss
|
March 11, 2010
Dove:

Check out the line in my first post..."Not only is this just a way to placate the native communities..." This is not one of those pieces of legislation that's being enacted because it's the will of the people. This fluff piece is to quiet the native community in order to gain the rural votes on significant and important pieces of legislation that really matter. Don't place more importance on this than is needed. Everyone knows why this is happening...we're just frustrated that it's happening when there are so many other pressing issues in the legislature that NEED to be worked on.
bump
|
March 11, 2010
I'm currently working on a 3rd stanza of the "Alaska's Flag" song. It will have to do with the pipeline days; buckets of money, the bars on 2 Street and 4th Ave., the workforce invasion, Jesse Carr, 798ers, cocaine, whiskey, and hookers.

I should have it ready in time for the next legislative session.
Dove
|
March 11, 2010
Of course it doesn't matter to you. Why should it? I think it does matter to many more people, or the Alaska legislature wouldn't be considering it.

So much for the neys.
Glacierwolf
|
March 11, 2010
We have bigger fish to fry in Juneau.

It's crap like this - wasting time on the state song, state dog, etc etc when we have real issues to deal with that makes me mad at Juneau. This is why our legislature has no damn business being in Juneau - it should be in Anchorage - so when the legislature shows up for work in the morning they can be greeted by thousands of us telling them to move on to bigger issues!!!!!
Dove
|
March 11, 2010
"rediculous"? "silly"?

I think giving tribute and recognition to our fellow native Alaska citizens and neighbors is long overdue.

No one barked at naming the Alaska state dog.

I dare say that the early settler's descendants are more native than any other race. How can any of you ignore this oversight?

Of course there are other issues worth addressing in Juneau, but the single most respectful bill before Alaska legislature is the Alaska Flag song.
blaqtie
|
March 11, 2010
This has now become RIDICULOUS! Alaska's politicians will join J. Danforth Quayle in the "wtf" category of American political history. THE ALASKA STATE SONG is ALREADY THE MOST BEAUTIFUL STATE SONG in the union of the 50 United States! Once, twice, THRICE: "IT AIN'T BROKE, DON'T FIX IT!" Oy! Please, do not change the state song of Alaska. Do not make me come up there and open a can of Katie Couric. SHE knows the Vulcan peace sign.
grace3
|
March 11, 2010
All of these arguments - legal, musical, historical, and nonsensical - were made before they voted. It is clear that the opinion of the people in general is not important.

And, as mentioned before and now - they don't have a single spare minute during the session to waste on anything that is not directly tied to the economy, public safety, or resource management.

Do all these legislators attend some kind of brain drain ceremony after being elected?
NotPc
|
March 11, 2010
Just another instance of trying to be "PC".....

GET OVER IT.
99712
|
March 11, 2010


Sen. Bunde pointed out in the debate today that there are many more important things for the legislature to be working on than this kind of silliness. Do we have affordable energy? No. A gasline? No. A new source of state revenue? No. New Hydro projects? No. A ten billion dollar obligation to the state retirement system? Yes.

The legislature is running out of time to tackle the improtant stuff- but rather than working on the hard issues they dunce around with this nonsense.

just-saying
|
March 11, 2010
Dermot is correct. The Alaska Flag Song does not need an additional verse.

The guys in Juneau need to get busy with important business, not this foolishness!

.
Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.