Former North Pole refinery owners ask judge to throw out tainted water lawsuit
by Amanda Bohman / abohman@newsminer.com
Mar 06, 2010 | 4828 views | 32 32 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print
FAIRBANKS — The former owner of an oil refinery connected to the contamination of groundwater in North Pole accepts no blame for the tainted water and has asked a judge to dismiss a lawsuit.

In court filings this week, a lawyer for Williams Alaska Petroleum Inc. raised questions about the validity of the lawsuit and asked for proof that dozens of private wells are contaminated with sulfolane, a chemical used in the oil refining process.

The Tulsa-based energy corporation admits that chemicals were spilled within the boundaries of the refinery but says it lacks sufficient information to accept blame for chemicals that may have leached off site.

Claims against Williams are barred by the company’s compliance with all applicable state and federal laws and orders, the company stated in the documents.

“Williams denies Plaintiffs’ allegations that it negligently released hazardous substances, which ultimately contaminated the ground water surrounding the North Pole refinery,” the court papers state.

Williams filed the 11 pages at the Rabinowitz Courthouse on Wednesday in response to a lawsuit involving Williams and Flint Hills Resources, the Wichita-based refining and chemicals company that bought the refinery in 2004.

James West, one of the affected property owners, filed a lawsuit in January, alleging Williams and Flint Hills are responsible for damage to the water supply, property values and health.

West is asking for more than $100,000, and his lawyer is seeking to broaden the case into a class action lawsuit.

Williams stated that West is not entitled to damages based on speculative injuries that might occur in the future.

The company also placed some blame on West either for “causing or exacerbating the alleged contamination” or for “failing to take action to mitigate the alleged contamination,” court documents state.

The oil giant questioned whether residents in North Pole knew of the contamination before last fall.

Williams is asking Superior Court Judge Mike McConahy to dismiss the lawsuit and award it compensation for attorneys fees.

The company is represented by two law firms, the Anchorage law firm of Tindall Bennett & Shoup and a Dallas-based law firm by the name of Conner & Winters.

Jason Weiner of Weiner & Gazewood in Fairbanks is representing West.

None of the attorneys involved in the lawsuit on either side could be reached Friday.

Flint Hills’ response to the lawsuit is pending. The company announced the contamination last fall and has been working with property owners to test wells and determine how widely the sulfolane has spread. An investigation by the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation is also underway.

Trace amounts of sulfolane have been detected in the North Pole municipal water system, although officials say the chemical is being washed out through the water treatment process.

The health effects of sulfolane are unclear but a federal agency has set acceptable limits in drinking water that are below levels found in some private wells.

Flint Hills has been providing bottled water to property owners. A spokesman for the company has said Flint Hills is seeking a long-term solution to make sure its neighbors have safe drinking water into the future.
Comments
(32)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
fishnhunter
|
March 09, 2010
I hope Weiner & Gazewood are up for the challenge. Even with Williams' flacid defense it's going to be stiff competition, hope they're ready to play hardball. heh
Shokd
|
March 09, 2010
Of course we need to throw out the suit! Why, that's just looking back. The past is the past. We need to look forward!

Right?

Accountability is for the little guys, like you and I.
packersfan
|
March 08, 2010
alaskana,

Mr. West's attorney's name is Jason Weiner and his telephone number is 452-5196.
alaskana
|
March 08, 2010
Bella, it will all come to a head, soon.

It is not all Williams fault, much of it lies in the pockets of MAPCO.

BUT, WHAT DOES THE BUY OUT STATE R; MAPCO ET AL????
bella_blue
|
March 08, 2010
"The company also placed some blame on West either for “causing or exacerbating the alleged contamination” or for “failing to take action to mitigate the alleged contamination,” court documents state."

Wow! That's just disgusting. I don't even know what to say about that. Isn't it their job to "mitigate the..contamination" not the property owners? Until November I had never even heard of Sulfolane so how in the world was I supposed to know to test for it in our well water? Williams Petroleum Alaska, Inc. = Pure Evil!!! Good to know that a human life means nothing compared to their big fat bank accounts.
alaskana
|
March 08, 2010
Can anyone give me the phone number of Mr. Wests attorney??? If so just post it here...
alaskana
|
March 08, 2010
Can anyone give me the phone number of Mr. Wests attorney??? If so just post it here...
Pearl=W
|
March 08, 2010
This is just the opening manuvere in what is likely to be a long, drawn out, chess match. *That's* why such company's are so arrogant - they have the monetary resources to "attorney-fee" the average householder to the poorhouse, and won't ever suffer any personal ill or discomfort for their actions [past or present].

And, I'd point out, this is why we, the people of the State, need a DEC that will functionas a watchdog for the citizens' interests, rather than a protector of 'development interests'.
jonpauls
|
March 08, 2010
Well...

Flint Hills/williams/Mapco, as much as I hold them in esteem, aren't the only ones out there. There have been stories of leaks and other concerns for as long as the site has been in use.

Also, I dont remember all of the specifics, but at one time there was an issue with a tank that was erected out at the refinrery site only to be suddenly torn down due to leaks.

One thing is for sure, Williams didn't get to where they are by being dumb. Alaska Attorneys had better pack a lunch.
wayuphere
|
March 08, 2010
alaskana, take your knowledge to someone in authority or the attorney of your choice. This will not only protect you, it may provide some reflief to those directly affected by the Williams/Flint Hills illegality.
alaskana
|
March 08, 2010
As the former fire chief and saftey person at the refinery, in the 70's, I could tell the right people some of the things that were going on during my employment.

I won't spash it across the comment section of the news miner.

I DON'T WANT ANYONE FROM WILLIAMS TRYING TO CONTACT ME...
theskiesthelimilt
|
March 07, 2010
Williams has answered the complaint with denial, Wiener and Gazewood will respond to Williams denial, Flint Hill has yet to answer complaint, but they will, Wiener and Gazewood will respond to Flint Hill and on and on and on...... Who wants to jump into this? not I, not at this time.....
blue5011
|
March 07, 2010
Where are those who advocated for the state to buy the refinery? How does this make you feel?
use_your_head
|
March 07, 2010
ok, the former owner is denying responsibility for ground water contamination that possibly occurred on its watch under its ownership of the refinery.

The immediate denial does not inspire trust in their words. Rather it confirms guilt in my mind. This will be a long process, I wonder if PG&E will help them come to their senses?
out_in_the_cold
|
March 07, 2010
Hum-m-m .. kind like a spilled glass of milk and can't find the cat to lick it up.

Probably be a good idea for somebody to start ordering the water and sewer pipe for a treated water system for miles around the North Pole refinery.
twain
|
March 07, 2010
Do you suppose the reason the oil pigs are so

arrogant is because they seen how exxon valdez

made out like a bandit in our facist supreme

court and realized they have nothing top fear

from our republican appointed judges.
Oh_please
|
March 07, 2010
Oh-please, this is not the Free Market at work. Why do you equate free enterprise with anarchy?

No, junior, I think that was you just now who did that...

If the law has been broken and Williams is found negligent, they should pay damages and fines.

I'm sure that's of great comfort to those around the refinery, Invictus. I hope those folks are ready to lawyer up!

Of course, plop rolls downhill; therefore, suggest choosing not to live downhill. BTW, no one in North Pole should be drinking untreated well water. That was known as bad water decades ago.

Translation: Getting poisoned by the refinery is your own fault.

Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.