Architectural Record reviews Fairbanks airport
by dermotcole
 Dermot Cole
Mar 05, 2010 | 1836 views | 21 21 comments | 13 13 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

An article in Architectural Record magazine on the renovation and expansion of Fairbanks International Airport describes the terminal as a "refreshing contrast to the local built environment."

The national magazine deals with many aspects of architecture and interior design, mainly for an audience of architects and engineers.

Writer Weld Royal says the design created by Bettisworth North,  a company founded by C.B. Bettisworth, uses common materials in a contemporary form:

The airport’s face to those arriving by road is a glass-paneled curtain wall marked by four vestibules in orange glass. Their permanent lighting gives off a firelike glow against the darkness, which by December descends on Fairbanks for all but a few hours.

Mechanical relics of abandoned mines provide inspiration for the entry hall. A series of nonstructural steel columns set up a nice vertical rhythm against the long horizontal structure. Their rusty patina is repeated inside the entry lobby. Metal sheets sprayed with an acid solution take on the color of worn leather and clad prominent interior wall spaces.

Visitors move through the lobby on an axial circulation path that extends like a spine along the front of the building and passes ticketing areas, rental-car booths, and baggage claim. “In the original terminal, people had no space to walk, but whether or not to build the spine was one of the biggest design decisions,” says Bettisworth.

The simple parti is bordered by exposed steel pillars wrapped in concrete planks. The planks were formed using a mold based on local spruce, giving the space a woody feeling. The path’s ceiling is heavy timber construction and glulam beams. The use of wood is repeated in paneling and ceilings throughout the terminal — conveying warmth and connecting travelers to Alaska’s great forests and a prevalent local construction material.

The transition of finishes and materials from the first-floor entry hall to the second-floor concourse is meant to convey to departing travelers the idea that they are leaving a pioneer town for a more refined destination, and just the opposite for those arriving.

The materials on the concourse are the same as the entry hall, but more polished. Its floor is covered in rich cherry wood; its wall panels are stainless steel. The volume of the concession area, with 22-foot-high ceilings, is double that of the concourse’s lounges. A glass-paneled expanse looks out to the Alaska Range. “When the sun shines, it’s magnetic,” says Bettisworth.

Comments
(21)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
coffeediva
|
March 08, 2010
Has anyone been to the Missoula airport? Kinda like ours, but NO orange, NO metal, more wood paneling, green effects and animals in display cases; and a great diner (not fancy, just great)with burgers and beer, a view of the runway, and a nice waitress that served me fast! Now *that's* what I'm talking about!
Right&Left
|
March 08, 2010
I'm with you guys the orange has got to go. I thought it was a protective film they had yet to take off. I do miss the old diner I can remember waiting for the always late planes there. I wish the east ramp would put together a restaurant.
Alaskaman100
|
March 08, 2010
Boodrow, it would be comparing apples and fish. The old terminal had sections with 1950's insulation and not nearly the square footage. If you want to look it up, go to the state omb website. You can find a few years there at least.

Maybe they could burn old tires and waste oil in the outdoor boiler.
Boodrow
|
March 08, 2010
Hey DNM, how about doing some investigative reporting and compare the heat bills for the new terminal vs the old. With all that glass this new one has got to have a very large oil hogging heat bill.

Maybe we should add a very large outdoor wood furnace for with the designers out there feeding the logs on the fire.
Alaskaman100
|
March 08, 2010
I travel quite a bit and the current Fairbanks airport terminal is better than the airport in any similar sized town. Part of the reason is it is difficult to think of another town the size of Fairbanks that has direct international service, handles everything from regional turboprops to 747s, and has the kind of volume that we see, especially in the summer.

Airline terminals age much faster than other public structures because they become obsolete at the pace of aviation industry changes. As they are required to handle new planes, security requirements, etc. the physical plant must be rennovated. Most airports have at least a major rennovation every few decades.

Why isn't there a full restruant in the airport? Because we are a destination. Very few people are laying over in the terminal waiting for a flight to another place. Those are the people who mostly eat in airports.

As for it's lack of "Fairbanksness," I think that a modern building with wooden accents is a wonderful addition to Fairbanks. While they could have kept the sheetrock and that funky staircase from the old terminal out of some sort of sense of nostalgia, why?
RandomThoughts
|
March 06, 2010
Warmth? That's not the feeling it gives to everyone. To some of us, it exudes Box Store, and is a fresh reminder of how much local identity Fairbanks is losing with the recent influx of replicated store-brand architecture that pops up around town like invasive weeds. This terminal is not a cookie-cutter piece, like those are, but it expresses a generic urban aesthetic that does not really fit us. In my opinion, this terminal could be dropped in any similarly-sized airport in the country, and it would not "speak Alaska" at all.

Actually, I would have been happy to see CB get these kudos from the magazine... if the airport was in some other city where the design better matched the place. I enjoy the architecture in the new Anchorage and Seattle airports... and would appreciate this one a lot more if it was somewhere else.
use_your_head
|
March 06, 2010
The orange doors are the biggest eyesore. Warm glow maybe but they're about as popular as a conex in the driveway in L.A.

I've seen a lot of people get off a plane and go "Are we in Portland?" Seriously, I like the outside appearance CB but couldn't it have been more Alaskan inside?

I too would rather see a nice restaurant upstairs. The coffee is nice but a good meal? Fugeddaboutit.
mit-1
|
March 06, 2010
Will we be tearing this one down in 20 years?
gmnorthey
|
March 05, 2010
Actually, interesting point regarding the huge glass window. It was my understanding that the savings in light costs during the summer months out-weighted the winter fuel bill. Not sure, but I had understood they had planned that...would love to know if that actually is working in reality.

I actually think the new building looks nice though both spendy and that orange vestibule needs to be changed.

Also, I too miss the old Bush Pilot Restaurant and Lounge. You used to be able to get a Burger and Fries for $9 and a good serving too. Soda was under $2 from the fountain, the prices were jacked up but not unreasonable for an airport. I suspect the $9 tuna sandwich reference is about $4 for the tuna sandwich and $5 to pay down the renovation bonds.

*NOTE: In fairness I work for the contractor that provides food service at the airport but am not directly affiliated with the airport nor do I actually know their commission rates but I am highly suspicious that they really jacked the rates up. Also, for the record, there is more space in the lavatory on your jet than there is in the new kitchen. Good luck getting burgers back.
Yukonjohn
|
March 05, 2010
Makes the Northward Building look like the Taj Majal!! Its the ugliest building in Fairbanks!! Remember when people used to go to the airport JUST to watch planes take off and have a couple of dinks in the great lounge it had?
oldakcuss
|
March 05, 2010
Congratulations on the recognition CB. I really enjoy using our new airport and am even happier that it was designed by a Fairbanksan. You and your staff did a great job. Hearty congratulations.
AKseahawk
|
March 05, 2010
Anyone that says the airport is the ugliest and biggest waste of money clearly hasn't been to the UAF museum. Now as for the airport...yeah, its certainly in the running for second. What's with the Orange? I'd love to see a NM poll on what fairbanks thinks.
jfbks
|
March 05, 2010
Congratulations CB!! As a life long Fairbanks resident I really appreciate your brilliance. It must be nice that your professional peers acknowledge this.
jfbks
|
March 05, 2010
10987654
|
March 05, 2010
Go around the side to the glass doors at the end of the baggage area, & watch the huge leak - oh, guess we'll have to wait until it's raining again. The 'new' airport looks not only like local building (cement) but if you add a few fans above the baggage carousels, it'll look just like Home Depot. Building supply store, anyone? Utterly amazing to me.

They took down the old airport & built one almost exactly like the old one except smaller, w/o amenities & w/o the art & artifacts. WTG. Lots of people have made mega-bucks off the Homeland Security boondoggle.
just-saying
|
March 05, 2010
Seems like a lot of hype from Bettisworth -- when do you expect a legitimate/honest assessment from the architect himself? Obviously, he has no taste, and since he's done most of the major buildings in town, Fairbanks has ugly buildings!

Specifically, I think the ugly orange panels need to be replaced -- they make the airport seem like it's still under construction!

.
robir8
|
March 05, 2010
I wish you could get something to eat besides $9.00 tuna sandwitch. Like a damn cheeseburger or some eggs in the morning like the old joint. The old, old joint had a good resturant.
therecalcitrant
|
March 05, 2010
Sorry, Mr. Bettisworth, but I have to agree that the outside of the terminal is, well, ugly. I was defensive of it at first when friends complained that the exterior was even uglier than before the renovation because I thought that it was a work in progress... but I guess that it's officially complete, now that Architectural Digest has inspected it and deemed it a "refreshing contrast to the local built environment". What does that mean anyway?
john_alaska
|
March 05, 2010
The new fairbanks terminal is the poorest example of architecture I think I have ever seen, I asked when the rusty steel beams in the front were going to get finished and found out that is it… Inside quality of work is poor and non-symmetrical design… Very poor grade from me.
icedberg
|
March 05, 2010
Great waste of money, all those windows and that open space will cost a lot to heat during the winter...
Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.