Alaska Department of Fish and Game plans aerial wolf hunts
by Tim Mowry / tmowry@newsminer.com
Mar 04, 2010 | 3120 views | 37 37 comments | 18 18 recommendations | email to a friend | print
FAIRBANKS — For the second year in a row, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game plans to use a helicopter to shoot wolves from the air in the Fortymile region near Tok as part of its predator control program.

In a report to the Alaska Board of Game in Fairbanks on Thursday, Tok-area biologist Jeff Gross said the department will take to the air as soon as there is fresh snow to help track and find wolves.

“We’re hoping for new snow to cover up the old tracks,” he said. “Generally, we like to go out within six or eight days after snow.”

Last year in March, department personnel shot and killed 84 wolves during six days using fixed-wing aircraft to find the wolves and a helicopter to shoot them.

The upper Tanana/Fortymile region is one of five areas in the state where aerial shooting or landing and shooting of wolves is allowed under the department’s predator management program.

Hunters doing so must have a permit from the state.

But, similar to last year, Gross said aerial wolf hunters haven’t come close to killing the number of wolves the state wants to cull from the Fortymile region to boost moose and caribou numbers. Only eight wolves had been killed by aerial hunters at last report, he told the board, which is in the midst of a 10-day meeting in Fairbanks scheduled to end Sunday.

The department wants to cull almost 200 of the estimated 300 wolves that biologists said range in the control area.

The total harvest of wolves in the control area last year was 220 wolves, with helicopter shooting accounting for 84 of the kills; harvest by gunners in fixed-wing aircraft, 49; and trapping and hunting, 87.

Gross said he would consider it a success if the department is able to approach last year’s helicopter harvest of 84 wolves. Lack of snow this winter has hindered control efforts by gunners in fixed-wing aircraft and has hampered trapping and hunting of wolves, so there might be more wolves, Gross said.

“Trappers and control permittees had been a lot more successful to date last year,” he said.

Predator control appears to have a positive effect on the moose and caribou populations in the Fortymile region, Gross told the board.

“I’d say we’re seeing progress on both fronts in part because of it,” he said. “It’s a piece of the puzzle, with weather being the driving factor.”

After Gross’ report, game board members Al Barrette and Ted Spraker suggested the department explore the possibility of employing helicopter shooting in other areas to meet harvest goals quicker so aerial control programs won’t be needed.

Barrette encouraged the department’s “helicopter cleanup,” as he put it, and said the department should consider using a helicopter earlier in the season, especially in forested areas such as the Fortymile country.

“Once you get the wolf populations down to a lower level, trappers have shown they can get the job done on the ground,” said Barrette, a trapper from Fairbanks.

Spraker agreed, saying the department should focus on areas where trappers and aerial gunners haven’t been successful.

“The department should not wait until March and April and risk losing the snow you need to do this,” said Spraker, of Soldotna. “Go in there after the first snow in the fall.

“If you’re able to remove some of those important packs, they won’t be operating on your moose all winter,” he said. “If we can be as efficient in these areas, we can reduce the number of years we’re involved in predation control.”

Contact staff writer Tim Mowry at

459-7587.
Comments
(37)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
helmanm
|
March 07, 2010
I am appalled by the egocentric desires to eliminate an estimated population of 200 wolves from the upper Tanana/Fortymile region. I do not support or accept this plan and the reasons to move it into effect. I feel that it disrespectful to change the populations of wolves for our own human purpose. The wolves survival mechanisms and instincts to hunt for food and care for themselves is as natural as can be. To remove wolves from this area to help with "predator control" is absurd and interferes with the natural lifecycle. Although I wish for healthy populations of caribou and moose I do not feel that killing off these beings is the solution. When will we step aside and allow life to go in it's natural ways without our human control and interference? The sad thing is that this is happening everywhere with different species and we still are not learning from our mistakes. We can have all the scientific statistics and jargon presented to us about this subject but none of it matters in the larger spectrum. I am saddened by these decisions.
helmanm
|
March 07, 2010
Alaskanate
|
March 05, 2010
Predator Management is not "hunting". It is the removal of excess predators by the most efficient means availble. Your choice of activist terminology to get a rise from your readership is disappointing, to say the least.
Examiner
|
March 05, 2010
It's not "hunting" when you do a "culling" program to eliminate a predator pit. Mr. Mowry knows that but would rather paint an untrue picture of what the Game Board is doing when it complies with the Alaska Intensive Management law after determining through scientifically sound evidence that the caribou population is being decimated as a result of predator pressure. And culling should be done, as one of my friends says, "as efficiently, effectively and humanely as possible." A load of buckshot from a certified shooter and the wolf is dead before he hits the ground.

I'll help pay for avgas so Alaskans can feed their families.
Yukonjohn
|
March 05, 2010
Invictus, I was stationed at Fort Yukon for the 90s and saw the results of govt. moose surveys. They used to come get our helicopter and go out to "kill" sites of moose. They started out that spring with 36 calves, by fall, there were 3. Most ALL were killed by black bear. A few from grizzs, and about 7 or 8 from wolves. We were pretty surprised, but they confirmed each one by hair taken from the kill site. Predators need to be controled. There is a horrible moose population on the Yukon Flats, and it should be teeming with moose.

Our State Constitution says game should be managed for sustained yield. That means so I can more easily go and get my meat for the winter. I have not hunted in quite a few years, but I want our game managed. Hey, it makes for more for the dang tourist to see too...don't people realize that??
Invictus
|
March 05, 2010
Now, I can't seem to find the reference I read that stated that up to 80% of neonatal caribou calves are lost to predation -- this was for either Porcupine or Weatern Arctic herd. I yield on that claim.

This study documented 65% mortality of collared caribou calves due to predation of the Fortymile Herd:

http://www.wildlife.alaska.gov/management/control/pdfs/3.43_01.pdf

"Wolf predation was the single most important cause of calf mortality..."
use_your_head
|
March 05, 2010
Where can I donate av gas?

Breeding wolves whelp 5-10 pups each year. Some are lost through natual accidents and internecine struggles but most will reach adulthood.

If by some miracle they actually kill the 200 of estimated 300 wolves in the area, the remainder will have more food to eat and multiply back within a few years.

I don't hunt the 40-mile. The state is required to manage our game populations for the benefit of our citizens. Subsistence and local tag holders only please where ever wolf controls are used. That's my opinion.
JaniceFbx
|
March 05, 2010
Sickening. I heard the Board of Game members speaking on the radio yesterday. Their arrogance was incredible, and it's obvious they have already decided what they are going to do, citizens comments be damned.
ulogoni
|
March 05, 2010
"Caribou populations characteristically fluctuate dramatically." Any perceived benefit from killing wolves is temporary. Out of 58 large caribou herds in the Northern Hemisphere, 34 are declining. For 16 others there is no data.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/earth/hi/earth_news/newsid_8094000/8094036.stm

They try to justify slaughtering wolves in Alberta as well. Failing to address logging, oil and gas development or other sources that have major impacts on habitat. Instead they authorize more of such. And kill wolves.

http://www.canadaviews.ca/2009/11/26/woodland-caribou-herds-declining-toward-extinction-in-alberta/

If you think you can justify killing wolves to save moose and caribou, you might as well be justifying killing your own species to do the same. Competing for scraps with those who have no other way of surviving and are not at fault is shameful. Meanwhile the machine marches on.

"The department wants to cull almost 200 of the estimated 300 wolves that biologists said range in the control area." Tragic!
4thstreet
|
March 05, 2010
"Now, if you substituted "sportsman" for "hunters""

well yes, but then that doesn't really fit either. it seems we need a new word for these people.
LostAlaskan99712
|
March 05, 2010
You can't rob White Fang to pay Bambi.
Pearl=W
|
March 05, 2010
Wrong predator.

To increase the moose and caribou populations there, try opening up a no-bag-limit season on non-local predators, say Aug through Feb., see what kind of results that gets on the stats. But not by gunning from a chopper - that's just sick.
longhornak
|
March 05, 2010
"they are hunters. they are not there to take care of the environment; they are there to make sure they always have things to shoot."

What? Let me explain something. Hunters do take care of the environment. True hunters respect nature and do not take what they will not use. I should know; I am a hunter. Maybe some hunters follow these rules so we do have things to shoot. However, most follow these rules because it is THE RIGHT THING TO DO.

Now, if you substituted "sportsman" for "hunters" in your statement 4thstreet, you may have a point. I personally am against aerial wolf hunting (not really hunting, but I'm using their terminology). I am also against moose cow hunting. However, I am also not a biologist and have not studied it out, so I may not know what I am talking about. :-)
Sweet_Pea
|
March 05, 2010
Sickening.
Audrey25
|
March 05, 2010
This makes me so sad.
rusty_shackleton
|
March 05, 2010
Here's hopng there's no more snow...

Ya know what I think? The homo sapien population in Anchorage & Mat-su is out of control. I have a right to quickly and easily blow in there, pull into REI and Best Buy to do some quick shopping, and stop into Arby's for a meal and then head back north. But no, the overpopulation makes this a grueling and tiresome affair involving much sitting in traffic and cursing at the proliferation of humans impedeing my progress.

I propose a Anchorage-ite culling program that will allow us real Alaskans to utilize that city how best we see fit, and not have to be inconvenienced by the traffic jams those city-dwellers cause on our way south to the Kenai. Give me a helicopter and me and my buddies will take care of this problem once and for all!
wlfwmn
|
March 05, 2010
I don't know where some people get their facts a Cracker Jack Box? How many wolf kills have you haters seen? You say 80% of kills are calves...not hardly but some... but that’s not 80% of the calves born.... Have you ever seen a mother protect a calf... I have countless times and a mother is an awesome creature when it comes to protecting her young...and wolves are not likely to risk injury, they will turn tail and run....Get your facts right before you divulge your absence of experience. Here’s a quote from Chief Seattle maybe you think he was an idiot too... “What is man without the beasts? If all the beasts were gone, man would die from a great loneliness of spirit. For whatever happens to the beasts, soon happens to man. All things are connected.” You must be very angry and shallow people to be so full of hate....To kill any animal and not give it a fighting chance is cowardice…
Invictus
|
March 05, 2010
Every now and again, a jewel is found:

"I'm applaud at the ignorance...."

Priceless

"Wolves kill the weak, sick, old..." but, about 80% of their kills are of newborns and calves. It's the myths and near-myths that allow us to sleep at night.
fishnhunter
|
March 05, 2010
Never argue with an idiot, he'll just drag you down to his level and then beat you with experience.

That's directed at all of you "leave the poor wolves alone" people.

4thstreet
|
March 05, 2010
you have to remember: these are Department of Fish and Game people they have never been known for their intelligence. when they went to college they took classes like 'how to count ducks' or 'how to find the radio collar'. they are not 'biology' people; they are hunters. they are not there to take care of the environment; they are there to make sure they always have things to shoot. they don't know anything about the animals under their control; killing animals is what they are about.
Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.