Drug testing planned for Iditarod mushers
by Matias Saari / msaari@newsminer.com
Dec 05, 2009 | 9278 views | 63 63 comments | 36 36 recommendations | email to a friend | print
FAIRBANKS — The Iditarod plans to test mushers for drugs and alcohol in March, a change that many mushers don’t have a problem with — unless one asks three-time champion Lance Mackey.

“I think it’s a little bit ridiculous,” Mackey said Wednesday night from his home near Fairbanks after a training run. “It is a dog race, not a human race. It (using a drug) doesn’t affect the outcome of the race.”

Mackey, a throat cancer survivor who has a medical marijuana card, admits to using marijuana on the trail and thinks his success has brought about jealousy from some fellow competitors.

“It isn’t the reason I’ve won three years in a row,” said Mackey, though he concedes that marijuana helps him stay focused during the nearly 10-day race.

Now Mackey will have to change his ways or risk disqualification. Aaron Burmeister, a member of the Iditarod’s board of directors, said the Iditarod Official Finishers’ Club has been requesting for years that mushers be drug tested.

“It’s time,” said Burmeister, a 12-time Iditarod finisher from Nenana.

The Iditarod has had a policy regarding drug and alcohol use since 1984, said Stan Hooley, executive director for the Iditarod Trail Committee. But he called it “fairly informal” and said to his knowledge mushers have never actually been tested. The Iditarod finally will enforce the rule for the 2010 race, Hooley said.

“Where during a race (we will test) has not yet been finalized,” Hooley said by phone on Monday. “It might be random. It might be a group of mushers at a specific checkpoint.”

Mushers probably will not be informed in advance when and where they will be tested, Hooley said. Urine samples will be sent to a lab in the Lower 48 with about a 48-hour turnaround for results, he added.

The bulk of the policy has been determined, Hooley said. That includes who will do the testing (the Anchorage company WorkSafe Inc., as a sponsor and at no cost to the Iditarod); what the prohibited list is (it includes marijuana, amphetamines, narcotics and opiates including codeine); and the criteria for a therapeutic use exemption.

“I expect at one checkpoint the top 20 or 30 teams will have to do a pee test,” musher Zack Steer of Sheep Mountain said. “I would hope that everybody comes back negative.”

Back in May, an expanded Rule 29 (“Use of Drugs and Alcohol”) was approved at an ITC board of directors meeting, with only board members John Handeland and Jim Palin voting no. Mushers began signing up for the race under the new rules, which are published on the race’s Web site, in June and last month were sent a letter that stated the entire rule and included the recently approved list of prohibited drugs.

“I would be surprised if mushers weren’t aware of it,” Hooley said, adding that he has gotten no feedback from mushers — positive or negative.

Previously, mushers were subject to testing under reasonable suspicion from a race official or on a random basis. Now the circumstances include “a random group or all mushers on a date or dates to be determined within 30 days of the start of the race” and “the first fixed number of mushers who arrive at a stated checkpoint.”

“Failure of a drug test will result in disqualification,” Hooley wrote in an e-mail to the Daily News-Miner.

Refusing a test or adulterating a test specimen is also grounds for disqualification, according to the rule.

As for alcohol, the rule states, as it did before, that 0.04 blood-alcohol content — half the legal driving limit in Alaska — is a violation. That would trigger an unspecified discipline where the race marshal could use his discretion, Hooley said.

Reasons for testing

When it comes to dogs, the Iditarod and the Yukon Quest have for many years tested for a lengthy list of prohibited substances.

Hooley and mushers offered reasons justifying drug testing for humans as well.

Safety of the dogs is a race priority, and using drugs can adversely affect hand-eye coordination and motor skills, Hooley said.

Steer, a member of the Iditarod Rules Committee that he said “rubber-stamped” the expanded rule, said many professional sports have drug-testing programs and that the Iditarod is merely following suit.

“If you want to be judged as a world-class event, then that’s what you do,” said Steer, adding that he does not do drugs and is “ambivalent” about the rule.

Burmeister, a new father who is skipping this year’s race from Willow to Nome, said “We’re role models to kids all over the country. As professional athletes we need to step up to the plate.”

The driving force for the changed policy was the IOFC, which meets twice a year — at the opening sign-up in June in Wasilla and again after the race finish in Nome. It was the club’s recommendation that Iditarod officials acted on, Hooley said.

The issue has come up at club meetings for the last five years, Burmeister said.

“I’ve heard no people speak up against it at all,” he said, adding that 50 or more mushers attend some meetings.

Aliy Zirkle of Two Rivers said enforcing a drug policy has been on the front burner for a relatively small number of mushers.

“For a few people and a few mushers, it’s a really big deal,” said Zirkle, who also is the secretary/treasurer of the club.

Zirkle is not convinced the Iditarod will actually test in 2010. At the mandatory mushers meeting before the 2009 start, the race marshal announced the Iditarod would be testing during the race but didn’t, Zirkle said.

“It’s not a big shocker that they’re saying it again,” Zirkle said. “Maybe they will, maybe they won’t. That’s a gamble mushers may have to take.”

Hooley said no unfounded scare tactics are being used. “It is something we definitely plan to do,” he said.

How prevalent?

How prevalent drugs are in the Iditarod depends on who is asked.

“We don’t know. We don’t believe (they are),” Hooley said. “This effort will answer that question of what, if anything, is being used.”

Or it may just force those who have used drugs to abstain during the race, and likely before it so they can rid a banned substance from their bodies.

Mushers point to marijuana as the only noticeable drug being taken. Steer said he has smelled and seen marijuana on the trail but does not believe it helps or hinders a musher’s dog care.

“I’ve never seen a musher gain a competitive advantage,” Steer said.

Distance mushing is a sport where sleep deprivation is prevalent, and prohibited drugs like methamphethamine could help keep a musher alert and awake. Coming off of the high could be a problem, however.

Burmeister and Steer said use of those drugs, or opiates that could be used as pain killers, are merely rumors. Neither has seen evidence of their use during the race.

Sebastian Schnuelle of Whitehorse, who won the 2009 Yukon Quest and was second in last year’s Iditarod, had to dig the recent letter from the Iditarod out of the garbage when asked about it.

“I couldn’t think of functioning out there with any of it,” Schnuelle said, adding that he read the fine print closely to make sure he didn’t accidentally take a banned product like phencyclidine. “Most of those things, I don’t even know what the hell they are.”

But everyone knows what marijuana is. The drug is illegal under federal law, but Alaska law allows for personal possession of up to 1 ounce, provided the use occurs at home.

Marijuana is evident in mushing, but not to an excessive degree, Zirkle said, adding that she does not use it.

“I can’t say I’ve noticed it (in mushing) any more than in normal Alaskan life,” said Zirkle, who said she takes nothing more than caffeine during the 1,112-mile Iditarod that lasts more than two weeks for the slowest mushers.

The 1,000-mile Yukon Quest between Fairbanks and Whitehorse, Yukon, typically draws about a third of the mushers compared to the Iditarod and has nothing specifically in its rules about drug use for humans.

“No, we have not had that discussion, not that it’s an invalid one, mind you,” Eric Buetow, part of the Quest’s six-member rules committee, said just prior to the 2009 race.

However, there is a catch-all statutory compliance rule that reads “any musher who violates a state, territorial, national or international law while in the race may be disqualified if convicted.”

Mackey will comply

Several individuals — both for and against the drug policy — declined to be interviewed on the record because of the potentially controversial topic, but Mackey is not among them. The issue of mushers smoking on the trail is irrelevant because it hasn’t affected anyone’s race, he said.

And what he does in his time is his business.

“The Alaska lifestyle, you can do just about anything you want if you’re not bothering anybody,” he said. “You have a little more freedom in this state and smoking pot is kind of a common thing here in Alaska.”

Mackey doesn’t blame the Iditarod board for creating the new policy at the behest of the IOFC. Instead, Mackey contends he is being targeted by some competitive mushers.

“People are just jealous of what I’ve accomplished,” Mackey said.

Mackey claimed victory in the Iditarod from 2007-09 and the Quest from 2005-08 and is entered in both races again this year. Once for each race, he has been honored with the prestigious award for the best dog care.

Despite his medical marijuana clearance, Mackey said he will not pursue the Iditarod’s therapeutic use exemption. There is no certainty Mackey could overcome that restrictive clause and get an exemption anyway.

Instead, Mackey said he will race clean and expects to excel.

“If I don’t smoke all the way to Nome, I’ll do as good or maybe even better,” he said.

Mackey did say that marijuana can aid his performance.

“I think it just helps me stay awake and focus on what I’m doing,” Mackey said, adding that marijuana also helps his appetite.

Mackey said mushers will adhere to the rule because no one wants to jeopardize the chance to earn prize money. He won a new truck and $69,000 last year.

“I’ll bet you 10-to-1 that there’s no positive results,” he said.

Assuming he is asked to, Mackey will provide a urine sample just like the others.

“I’m going to pee in their little cup,” he said. “And laugh in their face (when the test comes back negative).”
Comments
(63)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Bigdog13
|
February 03, 2010
Lance, I think you will win anyway, you cant beat a winner. I live in WI and I don't see anything wrong with someone using marijuana as long as it don't affect me. Have a great race and don't let them push you around. Signed a fellow musher.
AK49
|
December 28, 2009
Let the dude cheef. He's gonna win anyway. sore losers need an excuse to try an get ahead and drug testing is just one of many... cry babies.
crzys_grl
|
December 07, 2009
i think they should be tested if there is a problem .... LIKE with the dude beatin his dogs a couple years ago! or if they go off the trail and they and the dogs are in danger!!! otherwise DROP IT!!!

it's a tough race in a tough state ...

work hard play hard leave us alone!!!
truthinnews
|
December 07, 2009
Must have been good sh**!
coffeediva
|
December 07, 2009
>>I know of a few of the Iditarods elite that have smoked a bowel that is also some of the board if directors <<

Smoked a bowel? Ewwww, sounds messy! ;-P
mattmanak
|
December 07, 2009
Say_what64 you hit it on the nose I know of a few of the Iditarods elite that have smoked a bowel that is also some of the board if directors
stovepipe
|
December 07, 2009
So Lance is mentoring the Jamaican kid...or is it the other way around?
mattmanak
|
December 07, 2009
I think that it is terrible that there are a few mushers that have it out for lance Mackey (Ken Anderson) and there is more I have been around the Iditarod for 36 years my mom and dad were checkers in the 70s and 80s I think that its about the dogs Lance has a great dog kennel I belive that you can put Jeff or Martin on Lances dog team and they would not even come close too winning three in a row its how you bond with your dogs Lance is a great Coach and his dogs love him more than all you none Alaskans know Leave him alone Thats even the Iditarod Trail Commity. Lances father (Dick) was one of the great mushers of his time I think we should go back to the old days and let the mushers run go back to all volinters get rid of some of the dig Money (Stan Hooley the race marshel and ther is even more we need to get back to the old days. All of you mushers that have it out for Lance Mackey you better become a better dog musher because this way is for cry babies. Thank you
truthinnews
|
December 07, 2009
I think it is terrible that someone would choose to self medicate with a drug that can be grown for pennies instead of dutifully paying thousands of dollars for "legal drugs". This has got to be another one of those socialist's schemes to banckrupt our drug and insurance companies.
PMcGraw
|
December 06, 2009
Jamie, I will agree to disagree but as an ex musher know these dogs love to run. This is a great sport that is an Alaskan way of life. The dogs would not exist if not for it. As far as Lost99712 goes I do hope you stay lost as you seem very far from Alaskan. I think drug testing the mushers is silly and do not think much drug use would enhance the team. Now if a team was to be hurt or treated poorly maybe this would warrant such a thing. But this seems more of a personal attack at Mackey then anything else.

Pat

Prodigal_Son
|
December 06, 2009
musher09, swanny, and several others have asserted as meaningful and clear of observations as any here. Thank you for your observations and placement of priorities.

Lance Mackey is, indeed, the same man whether medicated, or sober.

Those who imagine some sort of soul-stealing or personna-and-honor-robbing capacity inherent within the properties of cannabis are clearly either experientially, intellectually, or otherwise challenged beings.

But then 70 years of relatively unfetterewd (and often dishonest) anti-drug propaganda, paid for with public revenues in violation of federal anti-propaganda law, seems to have produced more than one or two idiots over that time.

In fact, I'd wager that the propaganda generated by the fevered prohibitionists in perpetuation of their neo-puritan drug war and self-serving employment has rendered more bafoons than the drugs themselves have.

The quality of closed-minded red-neck pseudo-intellectualism has plummeted dramatically since zero tolerance.
musher09
|
December 06, 2009
I don't see why people are making such a bid deal over this. It is no secret and it has been exposed for a long time. Last year when I was running the race a musher that was with me said he wanted some weed. He got some and over slept for hours in the next checkpoint. This drug is not going to help anyone including Lance. For those of you who think he is a lesser man for smoking it are being stupid. He is the same man and I hope all of you people get cancer one day and are prescribed medical marijuana so you can see what it is like to have it happen to you. When you see his record of being charged with possession of drugs you can tell that he went through a wild childhood. Knowing him he has calmed, down grew up, and is a great example for the kids. I am not afraid to say I am young and I look up to him and I would not be ashamed to be like him one day.
swanny1790
|
December 06, 2009
Downstream_ak, I think it would be more accurate to say "some mushers are pot heads....", rather than "many". Some musher are also law enforcement officers, some are active or reserve military, some are veterinarians or physicians, some are business operators, some are nurses, and the list goes on to include just about any occupation requiring a straight head and good judgment that you care to name.

I know mushers from each of those groups, and I'll dare to say that the proportion of mushers who routinely smoke pot is probably no higher than the proportion of the general population at large that does the same.

Lance Mackey is probably one of the most honestly open people you'll ever want to meet. That he was willing to speak freely and frankly with the media about this issue speaks highly of his character, especially given that "Several individuals — both for and against the drug policy — declined to be interviewed on the record because of the potentially controversial topic."

All of that aside, it seem that withdrawing sponsorship or support is punishing the race for doing exactly what you ask - they are making a good faith effort to enforce their rules regarding illegal substances and alcohol. What more do you expect of them?
GreatAmerican
|
December 06, 2009
DRUG TESTING IS UNAMERICAN. The founding fathers would never have allowed IT. Its the biggest invasion of privacy there is.
downstream_ak
|
December 06, 2009
It is appalling to think that my donations and support of the Quest and Iditarod are supporting the "Great Alaska Herb" race. It is no secret that many mushers are pot heads only to harm those that are clean. Mr. Burmeister. I salute you, however until the race..including Mackey can come clean no more sponsorship or support from me to support your events.
Jamie_Smith
|
December 06, 2009
Aaargh, in retrospect my knee-jerk reaction was inappropriately harsh, and I’ll state a retraction that many individual mushers do incredible charity work promoting good causes; programs like Mush For Kids for example are awesome and these folks deserve support: my apologies. The big races also do a decent job policing their own ranks when it comes to monitoring incidents of animal cruelty.

That said, I still think the Committee needs to stay focused on far more important issues especially in light of last year’s casualty list.



And while freighting tons of supplies around for these media events it’d be wise to keep in mind the current hardships many rural communities are facing this winter with dog food shortages.

There probably aren't going to be any charges of MWI or MUI anytime soon. And who knows, maybe a musher or two will champion NORML as a sponsor this year and everyone will just relax enjoy the ride.

scottportraits
|
December 06, 2009
Intolerance and bigotry go hand in hand. Tolerance is a Christian virtue. Zero-tolerance is a man-made concept that history proves is fatal.

Leave this guy Lance alone !! You are all jealous of his success, and will jump on anything to smear the opponent.

But rules are rules. That's what the Nazi's said....
Jamie_Smith
|
December 06, 2009
PMcraw, you are absolutely correct about the inevitability of Death, but that isn’t much of a justification in this case, and irrelevant to my point about misplaced priorities. It’s also somewhat of a self-fulfilling rationale, as large-scale kennels exist basically as puppy-mills to breed dogs that many of will be euthanized when their prime potential is reached – cyclic thinking. Besides, many dogs love antifreeze and to eat other things that will injure or kill them … the people here are supposed to be smarter and assume responsibility for the animals in their care.

The Committee is set on elevating mushing to the level of other “world-class” sports: ego-driven “professional athletes” in a pointless competition to win at all costs. The vanity of these distance races stand in stark contrast to overwhelming majority of recreational mushers, many in our own community: I have no problem whatsoever with them, and in fact would call the rare folks who mush for practical, functional reasons better “role models.” The Iditarod is for purely for entertainment purposes as a glamour sport and promoting the brand image of Alaska for marketing purposes, and it’s all about the personalities - hence the big names dropped in the article, and why they are testing the mushers for drugs - to keep that image clean.

Newsminer.com encourages a lively exchange of ideas regarding topics in the news. Users are solely responsible for the content. Comments are not pre-approved by News-Miner staff. Please keep it clean, respect others and use the 'report abuse' link when necessary. Read our full user's agreement.