The Fairbanks North Star Borough School District filed an unfair labor practices complaint against the FEA on Friday. It accused the teachers union of several violations. The school board postponed bargaining until the Alaska Labor Relations Agency rules on the charge.
On Monday, the seven-member FEA negotiations team and teacher supporters showed up to a scheduled bargaining session with the school district. They were met by Gayle Pierce, executive director for labor relations and Clarence Bolden, executive director for human resources. Pierce told the FEA team they would have to wait to hear from the labor relations agency before bargaining could move any further.
FEA President Tammy Smith said Friday, when news of the district’s filing came out, she was disappointed with the district’s refusal to bargain. She said she received the complaint that morning.
Smith wrote a response on the union’s website during the weekend.
The district, in its complaint, accused FEA of violating agreed-upon ground rules during an exchange of initial proposals last week. The union stipulated its first bargaining proposal would expire the next day. When the proposal expired without acceptance by the school board, the FEA submitted a new, all-inclusive proposal. The district said this essentially gave the union an unfair advantage — the district gave the union its initial proposal, but the union did not give the district a realistic initial proposal until after the union had seen the board’s.
Smith wrote in her response the district was well aware of the “blue light special,” with its next-day expiration. She said it was the association’s “good faith” way of honoring contract terms that had been settled last year in a different bargaining system.
“Although the district was clearly informed about FEA’s intent and did not express any concern to (negotiator Dave) Cox, they chose to file a ULP,” Smith wrote. “This type of ‘gotcha’ bargaining hurts the process and the relationship between teachers and the district.”
Smith also wrote the district’s contract proposal shows signs of “regressive bargaining,” something the district accuses the union of in its complaint.
“The district has proposed eliminating job share, taking away teacher control of grades and narratives, a reduction in time spent with students as a result of a new schedule that allows administrators to assign additional meetings, and the loss of ‘just cause’ protection for new hires,” she said.
Many teachers lamented the potential loss of job sharing, which they call one of the district’s most family-friendly policies.
“From my point of view, there’s no reason to eliminate it at all,” said Nicole O’Donnell, a high school English teacher who has been sharing her position on and off since she had her first daughter seven years ago. She now has two young daughters and can spend the first half of her day teaching morning classes at Lathrop High School and the second half at home with her kids.
She said she is no extra cost to the district because she doesn’t take health insurance and doesn’t get extra pay for working fewer hours. The English students don’t see the difference because O’Donnell and her counterpart don’t share any of the same classes.
O’Donnell said she sees a disproportionate amount of female teachers in the job-sharing positions because they use the opportunity to spend more time with their children. She said taking away such a family-friendly option will only hurt the district.
Other teachers at the Monday meeting supported a cost-of-living increase the FEA has proposed. In its “blue light special” offer, the FEA proposed a 2.5 percent increase to raises in a one-year contract. In its second proposal, the FEA proposed a
3 percent increase to teacher salaries.
The school district has proposed a 1 percent increase.
Contact staff writer Reba Lean at 459-7523.


Here is well written comment from the yahoo-chat room
"Captain America • Warren, Ohio • 2 hrs 48 mins ago [1/26/2011]
In 30 years as an Ironworker I was union for 7. All I ever saw the union do was protect lazy people from losing their jobs.
What is more fundamentally socialistic than a union? Everybody gets the same no matter what their performance level is. What then is the incentive for doing anything? Your get paid the same whether you work hard or not. "
"At one time in this country unions were an absolute necessity, men, women, and children were being subjected to deplorable working conditions for very little pay. (Watch the movie Matewan) But they have evolved into an entity no different than the companies were 100 years ago.
My company pays better, we have better benefits, and the men are treated very well."
This is why teachers should not have tenure -- no more dead wood on the taxpayer payroll at UAF, too
http://www.khanacademy.org/
Looks like several thousand online courses. Free.
http://news.yahoo.com/ap-exclusive-states-weaken-teacher-tenure-rights-051030720.html
''On Tuesday night, President Barack Obama weighed in on the issue during his State of the Union address. He said schools should be given the resources to keep and reward good teachers along with the flexibility to teach with creativity and to "replace teachers who just aren't helping kids learn.""
Translation: reward the good teachers with merit pay;
and do away with tenure.
I support President Obama's proposal.
|
17 Minutes Ago
all the bickering about salaries and benefits is a secondary issue. how about the issue of the sad state of education in Fairbanks when it comes to results. results! our kids are coming out of these....
Does my suggestion meet the deed you have defined?
Here is a sample of Cosmology 'Scale of the Universe'
Lesson #1
http://www.youtube.com/user/khanacademy#p/c/2186CFB2CE12A8B5/0/GZx3U0dbASg
Now, why are we paying anyone $90,000 to teach this information plus someone at $100,000 to make sure they do the job? Plus the cost of buildings and "props".
Anyone who is home schooling needs to send the links to others and political reps.
We tend to make grown-up problems seem complicated. And sometimes they are complex. But politics degrade the dignity of professionals. Let us reason with one another.
education factories with little or nothing in the way of a preparation for the real world. shouldn't the 'students' of these 'teachers' at least be able to function at the lowest level of the employment arena. these 'teachers' are giving us junk for our tax money and still they want more. show me some results please.
NONE
What may be need is helpers, but we wasting money on "smart" people.
Free education.. something like 2,000 lessons
Khan Academy
http://www.youtube.com/user/khanacademy
This is the preamble to what is going on.
This teacher has something like 1 million hits and 350,000 "students"
And yes, I was educated in the public schools by public teachers who managed to give me an education despite myself.
Thank you Teachers for ALL that you have done and continue to do!
How is it the school board administration has a labor relations executive director and a human resource executive director on payroll? Plus each will have an administrative assistant to boot. Is this what the general public, and the FEA of course, consider excessive administrative costs that need to be reviewed? Or is the labor relations position put their as a defense because the FEA exists?
If the school district eliminates the family friendly job sharing for teachers I would expect the administration to eliminate the HQ family friendly child care program for its staff as well.
Job sharing loss may not save us any money but eliminating the administrative child care program will decrease the administrative budget for sure.
Teachers, spend more time taking control of your union. The existing FEA is more concerned about existing and not existing for their members !
You sound like one of the Great Teachers that should get a $20,000 a year raise.
If I were you I would apply for a job in the NYC system.
These aren't my ideas but those of one of the most advanced mayors in the USA, Mayor Michael Bloomberg of NYC.
He just gave one of the most astounding speeches I have ever heard on CSPAN2. I just wish we could get this quality of leadership anywhere in this state.
We should not be Waiting for Superman!
They probably (like us) contribute a certain percentage each month! We contribute 8.6% of our paycheck every two weeks to retirement! That doesn't mean the school district contributes 91.4%!
LOL
They contribute a certain percentage as well!
It should also be noted that teachers cannot receive social security to supplement their retirement like most other workers!
True a teacher's salary is not taxed...but I've been working for the past 18 years...and only 11 of them have included my teaching career!
But the bottom line is that private sector (non-union) employees (which make of the vast majority our country) contriubted a MUCH higher percentage to their retirement (many are lucky to get any contribution from their employer at all). In a typical 401K plan (the employer contributes less than 10%)...how does that compare to TERS.
And you really want to use that the fact that teachers were somehow able to weasel out of Social Security contributions as a negative? Any person under 50 realizes that Social Security will be either bankrupt or will pay back far less than they contributed by the time they reach retirement (whatever that is...).
Do we have a deal?
If not, the teachers will get no sympathy from me.
Signed
BIG Taxpayer
I know I'm not looking for sympathy...but I do think the general public needs to be aware there are two sides to every story.
I think the generalization that your employees have better experience and education would be hard to defend - as you don't know how many in the district have bachelors, master, doctorates & how many years of experience they have under their belt.
Most have masters degrees in engineering or a hard science.
And a quick (and unscientific) poll of acquaintances leads to an average $500 deductible for health insurance. Not $2,000. Where does that come from? I'm not saying it's false, just that I don't see it.
Of course they are standard for public employees.
Do we have a deal?
it depends on which health insurance package you opt for!
if you want a smaller deductible...you pay a higher monthly cost...
Imagine another state office trying to pay its employees 2.5% less than it was budgeted for.
Just something to think about.